ArticleGenes2023
Finding Predictors of Leg Defects in Pigs Using CNV-GWAS.
Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational strategies for copy number variation detection, disease association, and beyond.Genome biology · 2026Review
- Genetic Architecture of Hock Joint Bumps in Pigs: Insights from ROH and GWAS Analyses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Visualization of Runs of Homozygosity and Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Biology · 2025Article
- Identifying Significant SNPs of the Total Number of Piglets Born and Their Relationship with Leg Bumps in Pigs.Biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One of the most important areas of modern genome research is the search for meaningful relationships between genetic variants and phenotypes. In the livestock field, there has been research demonstrating the influence of copy number variants (CNVs) on phenotypic variation. Despite the wide range in the number and size of detected CNVs, a significant proportion differ between breeds and their functional effects are underestimated in the pig industry. In this work, we focused on the problem of leg defects in pigs (lumps/growths in the area of the hock joint on the hind legs) and focused on searching for molecular genetic predictors associated with this trait for the selection of breeding stock. The study was conducted on Large White pigs using three CNV calling tools (PennCNV, QuantiSNP and R-GADA) and the CNVRanger association analysis tool (CNV-GWAS). As a result, the analysis identified three candidate CNVRs associated with the formation of limb defects. Subsequent functional analysis suggested that all identified CNVs may act as potential predictors of the hock joint phenotype of pigs. It should be noted that the results obtained indicate that all significant regions are localized in genes (CTH, SRSF11, MAN1A1 and LPIN1) responsible for the metabolism of amino acids, fatty acids, glycerolipids and glycerophospholipids, thereby related to the immune response, liver functions, content intramuscular fat and animal fatness. These results are consistent with previously published studies, according to which a predisposition to the formation of leg defects can be realized through genetic variants associated with the functions of the liver, kidneys and hematological characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.