Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38002848›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

An Integrated Approach Using HLAMatchmaker and Pirche II for Epitopic Matching in Pediatric Kidney Transplant-A Romanian Single-Center Study.

Paul Luchian Aldea, Maria Diana Santionean, Alina Elec, Adriana Munteanu, Oana Antal, Luminita Loga, Tudor Moisoiu, Florin Ioan Elec, Dan Delean, Bogdan Bulata and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul Luchian AldeaClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Maria Diana SantioneanDepartment of Mother and Child, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alina ElecClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1691-6729
Adriana MunteanuClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Oana AntalClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0183-9815
Luminita LogaClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Tudor MoisoiuClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Florin Ioan ElecClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Dan DeleanDepartment of Mother and Child, Discipline of Pediatrics II, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Bogdan BulataDepartment of Mother and Child, Discipline of Pediatrics II, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Andreea Liana Rachisan BotDepartment of Mother and Child, Discipline of Pediatrics II, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Renal transplantation (KT) is the most efficient treatment for chronic kidney disease among pediatric patients. Antigenic matching and epitopic load should be the main criteria for choosing a renal graft in pediatric transplantation. Our study aims to compare the integration of new histocompatibility predictive algorithms with classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching regarding different types of pediatric renal transplants. (2) Methods: We categorized our cohort of pediatric patients depending on their risk level, type of donor and type of transplantation, delving into discussions surrounding their mismatching values in relation to both the human leukocyte antigen Matchmaker software (versions 4.0. and 3.1.) and the most recent version of the predicted indirectly identifiable HLA epitopes (PIRCHE) II score. (3) Results: We determined that the higher the antigen mismatch, the higher the epitopic load for both algorithms. The HLAMatchmaker algorithm reveals a noticeable difference in eplet load between living and deceased donors, whereas PIRCHE II does not show the same distinction. Dialysis recipients have a higher count of eplet mismatches, which demonstrates a significant difference according to the transplantation type. Our results are similar to those of four similar studies available in the current literature. (4) Conclusions: We suggest that an integrated data approach employing PIRCHE II and HLAMatchmaker algorithms better predicts histocompatibility in KT than classical HLA matching.

Indexed as

epitopegraftHLAMatchmakerkidneymismatchpediatricPIRCHE IIrenaltransplantation

Identifiers

PMID38002848
PMCPMC10670802
OpenAlexW4388103570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.