Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38002798›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

The Comparison of Endovascular and Open Surgical Treatment for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Terms of Safety and Efficacy on the Basis of a Single-Center 30-Year Experience.

Mansur Duran, Amir Arnautovic, Cem Kilic, Julian-Dario Rembe, Joscha Mulorz, Hubert Schelzig, Markus Udo Wagenhäuser, Waseem Garabet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A bibliometric analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysm (2014-2024).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mansur DuranDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Marienhospital Gelsenkirchen, Teaching Hospital of Ruhr-University Bochum, Virchowstraße 135, 45886 Gelsenkirchen, Germany.
Amir ArnautovicDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Cem KilicDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, KLINIKUM Westfalen GmbH, Am Knappschaftskrankenhaus 1, 44309 Dortmund, Germany.
Julian-Dario RembeDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5176-6941
Joscha MulorzDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hubert SchelzigDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Markus Udo WagenhäuserDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0379-8607
Waseem GarabetDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-9271-8697
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEKlinikum Westfalen (Germany) · DEMarienhospital Gelsenkirchen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRuptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a critical condition with a high mortality rate. Over the years, endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has evolved as a viable treatment option in addition to open repair (OR). The primary objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of EVAR and OR for the treatment of rAAA based on a comprehensive analysis of our single-centre 30-year experience.

methodsPatients treated for rAAA at the Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2022 were included. Relevant information was retrieved from archived medical records. Patient survival and surgery-related complications were analysed.

resultsNone of the patient-specific markers, emergency department-associated parameters, and co-morbidities were associated with patient survival. The 30-day and in-hospital mortality was higher in the OR group vs. in the EVAR group (50% vs. 8.7% and 57.1% vs. 13%, respectively). OR was associated with more frequent occurrence of more severe complications when compared to EVAR. Overall patient survival was 56 ± 5% at 12 months post-surgery (52 ± 6% for OR vs. 73 ± 11% for EVAR, respectively) (

conclusionOR was associated with more severe complications in our study. EVAR initially outperformed OR for rAAA regarding patient survival while re-interventions following EVAR negatively affect survival in the long-term. Elderly patients should be treated with EVAR. Gender does not seem to have a significant impact on survival.

Indexed as

endovascular aortic repairopen surgical repairpatient survivalruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Identifiers

PMID38002798
PMCPMC10672125
OpenAlexW4388834688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.