Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38002741›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Enchondroma Detection from Hand Radiographs with an Interactive Deep Learning Segmentation Tool-A Feasibility Study.

Turkka Tapio Anttila, Samuli Aspinen, Georgios Pierides, Ville Haapamäki, Minna Katariina Laitinen, Jorma Ryhänen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Turkka Tapio AnttilaMusculoskeletal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Hand Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1563-1940
Samuli AspinenMusculoskeletal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Hand Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.
Georgios PieridesMusculoskeletal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Hand Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.
Ville HaapamäkiDepartment of Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7191-6185
Minna Katariina LaitinenMusculoskeletal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9975-0121
Jorma RyhänenMusculoskeletal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Hand Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4676-2831
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Finnish Medical Foundation 123456Helsinki University Hospital 1234567The Finnish Society for Surgery of the Hand 1234567Vappu Uuspää Foundation 1234567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enchondromas are common benign bone tumors, usually presenting in the hand. They can cause symptoms such as swelling and pain but often go un-noticed. If the tumor expands, it can diminish the bone cortices and predispose the bone to fracture. Diagnosis is based on clinical investigation and radiographic imaging. Despite their typical appearance on radiographs, they can primarily be misdiagnosed or go totally unrecognized in the acute trauma setting. Earlier applications of deep learning models to image classification and pattern recognition suggest that this technique may also be utilized in detecting enchondroma in hand radiographs. We trained a deep learning model with 414 enchondroma radiographs to detect enchondroma from hand radiographs. A separate test set of 131 radiographs (47% with an enchondroma) was used to assess the performance of the trained deep learning model. Enchondroma annotation by three clinical experts served as our ground truth in assessing the deep learning model's performance. Our deep learning model detected 56 enchondromas from the 62 enchondroma radiographs. The area under receiver operator curve was 0.95. The F1 score for area statistical overlapping was 69.5%. Our deep learning model may be a useful tool for radiograph screening and raising suspicion of enchondroma.

Indexed as

benign tumordeep learningenchondromahand radiographmachine learningradiographsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID38002741
PMCPMC10672653
OpenAlexW4388722934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.