Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38002694›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

The Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Classification of Craniofacial Deformities.

Reinald Kuehle, Friedemann Ringwald, Frederic Bouffleur, Niclas Hagen, Matthias Schaufelberger, Werner Nahm, Jürgen Hoffmann, Christian Freudlsperger, Michael Engel, Urs Eisenmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Reinald KuehleDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9941-6772
Friedemann RingwaldInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0572-4820
Frederic BouffleurDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Niclas HagenInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8578-8703
Matthias SchaufelbergerInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute for Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7501-9222
Werner NahmInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute for Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8095-5090
Jürgen HoffmannDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1322-755X
Christian FreudlspergerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael EngelDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Urs EisenmannInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8770-3822
Heidelberg University · DEKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positional cranial deformities are a common finding in toddlers, yet differentiation from craniosynostosis can be challenging. The aim of this study was to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify craniofacial deformities based on 2D images generated using photogrammetry as a radiation-free imaging technique. A total of 487 patients with photogrammetry scans were included in this retrospective cohort study: children with craniosynostosis (n = 227), positional deformities (n = 206), and healthy children (n = 54). Three two-dimensional images were extracted from each photogrammetry scan. The datasets were divided into training, validation, and test sets. During the training, fine-tuned ResNet-152s were utilized. The performance was quantified using tenfold cross-validation. For the detection of craniosynostosis, sensitivity was at 0.94 with a specificity of 0.85. Regarding the differentiation of the five existing classes (trigonocephaly, scaphocephaly, positional plagiocephaly left, positional plagiocephaly right, and healthy), sensitivity ranged from 0.45 (positional plagiocephaly left) to 0.95 (scaphocephaly) and specificity ranged from 0.87 (positional plagiocephaly right) to 0.97 (scaphocephaly). We present a CNN-based approach to classify craniofacial deformities on two-dimensional images with promising results. A larger dataset would be required to identify rarer forms of craniosynostosis as well. The chosen 2D approach enables future applications for digital cameras or smartphones.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecongenital abnormalitiescraniosynostosesdeep learningphotogrammetrytrigonocephaly

Identifiers

PMID38002694
PMCPMC10672418
OpenAlexW4388672431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.