ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Memory Impairments and Wellbeing in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional brain network alterations linked to cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer patients.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Identifying pre-treatment risk factors for cancer-related cognitive decline in patients with breast cancer.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Efficacy of Technology-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation Tools for Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Non-CNS Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Subjective memory impairment in long-term breast cancer survivors-associated factors and comparisons to controls from the HUNT study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Trajectories of Cognitive Complaints in Patients With Breast Cancer and Their Association With Psychosocial and Neurobiological Factors.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Everyday Memory Questionnaire-Revised (EMQ-R): Psychometric Validation of the European Portuguese Version in Non-Clinical Sample.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Metacognitive Prospective Memory Inventory-Short Form (MPMI-s) in Non-Central Nervous System Cancer Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating Symptom Burden Among Omani Women Newly Diagnosed with Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Association between hippocampal subfield volumes and working memory in middle-aged and older adult cancer patients.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Specificity and integration of meaning in self-defining memories of breast cancer survivors: clinical reflections to promote a narrative identity integration.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most diagnosed cancers among women. Its effects on the cognitive and wellbeing domains have been widely reported in the literature, although with inconsistent results. The central goal of this review was to identify, in women with breast cancer, the main memory impairments, as measured by objective and subjective tools and their relationship with wellbeing outcomes. The systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest databases. The selected studies included 9 longitudinal and 10 cross-sectional studies. Although some studies included participants undergoing multimodal cancer therapies, most focused on chemotherapy's effects (57.89%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.