Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38002555›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2023

Effect of Chronic Ankle Instability on the Biomechanical Organization of Gait Initiation: A Systematic Review.

Mohammad Yousefi, Shaghayegh Zivari, Eric Yiou, Teddy Caderby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad YousefiFaculty of Sport Sciences, University of Birjand, Birjand 9717434765, Iran.
Shaghayegh ZivariFaculty of Sport Sciences, University of Birjand, Birjand 9717434765, Iran.ORCID 0009-0006-5994-0234
Eric YiouComplexité, Innovation, Activités Motrices et Sportives (CIAMS), Université Paris-Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France.
Teddy CaderbyLaboratoire IRISSE-EA 4075, UFR des Sciences de l'Homme et de l'Environnement, Université de La Réunion, 97430 Le Tampon, La Réunion, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1033-8262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review was conducted to provide an overview of the effects of chronic ankle instability (CAI) on the biomechanical organization of gait initiation. Gait initiation is a classical model used in the literature to investigate postural control in healthy and pathological individuals. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles. Eligible studies were screened and data extracted by two independent reviewers. An evaluation of the quality of the studies was performed using the Downs and Black checklist. A total of 878 articles were found in the initial search, but only six studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings from the literature suggest that CAI affects the characteristics of gait initiation. Specifically, individuals with CAI exhibit notable differences in reaction time, the spatiotemporal parameters of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) and step execution, ankle-foot kinematics, and muscle activation compared to healthy controls. In particular, the observed differences in APA patterns associated with gait initiation suggest the presence of supraspinal motor control alterations in individuals with CAI. These findings may provide valuable information for the rehabilitation of these patients. However, the limited evidence available calls for caution in interpreting the results and underscores the need for further research.

Indexed as

ankle injuryanticipatory postural adjustmentscenter of pressuregaitlocomotionmuscle activity

Identifiers

PMID38002555
PMCPMC10669647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.