Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38002537›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2023

A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Drugs on the Quality of Life of Patients with Schizophrenia.

Gaia Sampogna, Matteo Di Vincenzo, Luigi Giuliani, Giulia Menculini, Emiliana Mancuso, Eleonora Arsenio, Salvatore Cipolla, Bianca Della Rocca, Vassilis Martiadis, Maria Salvina Signorelli and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Evenamide reverses schizophrenia-related dysfunction in a neurodevelopmental animal model.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gaia SampognaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Matteo Di VincenzoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Luigi GiulianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Giulia MenculiniDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy.
Emiliana MancusoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Eleonora ArsenioDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Salvatore CipollaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8995-9020
Bianca Della RoccaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Vassilis MartiadisDepartment of Mental Health, ASL Napoli 1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3344-1000
Maria Salvina SignorelliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy.
Andrea FiorilloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITRegione Campania · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacological antipsychotic drug interventions represent the cornerstone of the management of patients with schizophrenia and other psychotic spectrum disorders. The choice of the "best" treatment should be made on the basis of several clinical domains. However, despite available treatments, the quality of life reported by patients with schizophrenia taking antipsychotics is still very poor, and this outcome is rarely taken into account in trials assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments. Therefore, we performed a systematic review in order to assess the impact of antipsychotic treatment on patients' quality of life. In particular, we aimed to identify any differences in the improvement in quality of life according to the (a) type of formulation of antipsychotic drugs (i.e., oral vs. depot vs. long-acting injectable); (b) type of the drug (first vs. second vs. third generation); and (c) patients' clinical characteristics. One hundred and eleven papers were included in the review. The main findings were as follows: (1) quality of life is usually considered a secondary outcome in trials on the efficacy and effectiveness of drugs; (2) second-generation antipsychotics have a more positive effect on quality of life; and (3) long-acting injectable antipsychotics are associated with a more stable improvement in quality of life and with a good safety and tolerability profile. Our systematic review confirms that quality of life represents a central element for selecting the appropriate treatment for people with schizophrenia. In particular, the availability of new treatments with a better tolerability profile, a proven effectiveness on patients' cognitive and social functioning, and with a more stable blood concentration might represent the appropriate strategy for improving the quality of life of people with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

antipsychotic drugsneurolepticsoutcome assessmentpersonalized treatmentquality of lifeschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID38002537
PMCPMC10669728
OpenAlexW4388567999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.