Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38002491›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Comparison of the 10-, 14- and 20-Item CES-D Scores as Predictors of Cognitive Decline.

Ainara Jauregi-Zinkunegi, Rebecca Langhough, Sterling C Johnson, Kimberly D Mueller, Davide Bruno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ainara Jauregi-ZinkunegiSchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1307-2989
Rebecca LanghoughWisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Sterling C JohnsonWisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Kimberly D MuellerWisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Davide BrunoSchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1943-9905

Funding

Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention: Sex Differences in DNA MethylationR01AG027161 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Nathaniel Ark Chin, Sterling C Johnson · 2007 to 2026
$35.6M
Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's PreventionRF1AG027161 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JOHNSON, STERLING C · 2018 to 2018
$18.8M
Novel Story Recall Measures as Indicators of Cognitive Decline Associated with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Biomarkers: A Collaborative Study of Existing DataR01AG070940 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Kimberly D Mueller · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 144 AAI8612NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027161NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070940NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG027161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between depressive symptomatology and cognitive decline has been examined using the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D); however, concerns have been raised about this self-report measure. Here, we examined how the CES-D total score from the 14- and 10-item versions compared to the 20-item version in predicting progression to cognitive decline from a cognitively unimpaired baseline. Data from 1054 participants were analysed using ordinal logistic regression, alongside moderator and receiver-operating characteristics curve analyses. All baseline total scores significantly predicted progression to cognitive decline. The 14-item version was better than the 20-item version in predicting consensus diagnosis, as shown by their AICs, while also showing the highest accuracy when discriminating between participants by diagnosis at last visit. We did not find sex to moderate the relationship between CES-D score and cognitive decline. Current findings suggest the 10- and 14-item versions of the CES-D are comparable to the 20-item version, and that the 14-item version may be better at predicting longitudinal consensus diagnosis compared to the 20-item version.

Indexed as

agingCES-Dcognitive declinedepressionMCI

Identifiers

PMID38002491
PMCPMC10669678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.