ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
SpineHRformer: A Transformer-Based Deep Learning Model for Automatic Spine Deformity Assessment with Prospective Validation.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scalable and Robust Artificial Intelligence for Spine Alignment Assessment: Multicenter Study Enabled by Real-Time Data Transformation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Superior performance of a center-point AI model over VFLDNet in automated cobb angle estimation for scoliosis assessment.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- Achieving enhanced diagnostic precision in endometrial lesion analysis through a data enhancement framework.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Cobb angle (CA) serves as the principal method for assessing spinal deformity, but manual measurements of the CA are time-consuming and susceptible to inter- and intra-observer variability. While learning-based methods, such as SpineHRNet+, have demonstrated potential in automating CA measurement, their accuracy can be influenced by the severity of spinal deformity, image quality, relative position of rib and vertebrae, etc. Our aim is to create a reliable learning-based approach that provides consistent and highly accurate measurements of the CA from posteroanterior (PA) X-rays, surpassing the state-of-the-art method. To accomplish this, we introduce SpineHRformer, which identifies anatomical landmarks, including the vertices of endplates from the 7th cervical vertebra (C7) to the 5th lumbar vertebra (L5) and the end vertebrae with different output heads, enabling the calculation of CAs. Within our SpineHRformer, a backbone HRNet first extracts multi-scale features from the input X-ray, while transformer blocks extract local and global features from the HRNet outputs. Subsequently, an output head to generate heatmaps of the endplate landmarks or end vertebra landmarks facilitates the computation of CAs. We used a dataset of 1934 PA X-rays with diverse degrees of spinal deformity and image quality, following an 8:2 ratio to train and test the model. The experimental results indicate that SpineHRformer outperforms SpineHRNet+ in landmark detection (Mean Euclidean Distance: 2.47 pixels vs. 2.74 pixels), CA prediction (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.86 vs. 0.83), and severity grading (sensitivity: normal-mild; 0.93 vs. 0.74, moderate; 0.74 vs. 0.77, severe; 0.74 vs. 0.7). Our approach demonstrates greater robustness and accuracy compared to SpineHRNet+, offering substantial potential for improving the efficiency and reliability of CA measurements in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.