Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38002413›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Comprehensive Review of Computer-Aided Models for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Histopathology Images.

Alberto Labrada, Buket D Barkana

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto LabradaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, The University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT 06604, USA.
Buket D BarkanaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA.
University of Akron · USUniversity of Bridgeport · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second most common cancer in women who are mainly middle-aged and older. The American Cancer Society reported that the average risk of developing breast cancer sometime in their life is about 13%, and this incident rate has increased by 0.5% per year in recent years. A biopsy is done when screening tests and imaging results show suspicious breast changes. Advancements in computer-aided system capabilities and performance have fueled research using histopathology images in cancer diagnosis. Advances in machine learning and deep neural networks have tremendously increased the number of studies developing computerized detection and classification models. The dataset-dependent nature and trial-and-error approach of the deep networks' performance produced varying results in the literature. This work comprehensively reviews the studies published between 2010 and 2022 regarding commonly used public-domain datasets and methodologies used in preprocessing, segmentation, feature engineering, machine-learning approaches, classifiers, and performance metrics.

Indexed as

breast cancerclassificationcomputer-aided diagnosis (CAD)deformable modeshistopathologymachine learningreview

Identifiers

PMID38002413
PMCPMC10669627
OpenAlexW4388451584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.