Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38002390›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Multi-Dataset Comparison of Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy from Fundus Photographs.

Elizabeth E Hwang, Dake Chen, Ying Han, Lin Jia, Jing Shan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. JustRAIGS: Justified Referral in AI Glaucoma Screening Challenge.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Meeting Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Glaucoma.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth E HwangDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Dake ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Ying HanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Lin JiaDigillect LLC, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Jing ShanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ANDERSON, MARK S · 1985 to 2020
$29.6M
Interrogating the role of Notch signaling in lung adenocarcinoma tumorigenesisF30CA250157 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HWANG, ELIZABETH E · 2020 to 2023
$180k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA250157NCI NIH HHS F30CA250157NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007618NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) can be diagnosed and monitored using fundus photography, a widely available and low-cost approach already adopted for automated screening of ophthalmic diseases such as diabetic retinopathy. Despite this, the lack of validated early screening approaches remains a major obstacle in the prevention of glaucoma-related blindness. Deep learning models have gained significant interest as potential solutions, as these models offer objective and high-throughput methods for processing image-based medical data. While convolutional neural networks (CNN) have been widely utilized for these purposes, more recent advances in the application of Transformer architectures have led to new models, including Vision Transformer (ViT,) that have shown promise in many domains of image analysis. However, previous comparisons of these two architectures have not sufficiently compared models side-by-side with more than a single dataset, making it unclear which model is more generalizable or performs better in different clinical contexts. Our purpose is to investigate comparable ViT and CNN models tasked with GON detection from fundus photos and highlight their respective strengths and weaknesses. We train CNN and ViT models on six unrelated, publicly available databases and compare their performance using well-established statistics including AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. Our results indicate that ViT models often show superior performance when compared with a similarly trained CNN model, particularly when non-glaucomatous images are over-represented in a given dataset. We discuss the clinical implications of these findings and suggest that ViT can further the development of accurate and scalable GON detection for this leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide.

Indexed as

deep learningfundus photographyglaucomavision transformer

Identifiers

PMID38002390
PMCPMC10669064
OpenAlexW4388101642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.