Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38002383›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Applied Methods to Assess the Antimicrobial Activity of Metallic-Based Nanoparticles.

Etelka Chung, Guogang Ren, Ian Johnston, Rupy Kaur Matharu, Lena Ciric, Agnieszka Walecka, Yuen-Ki Cheong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Bioengineered ZnScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles usingFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nail Lacquer ContainingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Etelka ChungCentre for Engineering Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6919-4876
Guogang RenCentre for Engineering Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8865-1526
Ian JohnstonCentre for Engineering Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9696-3191
Rupy Kaur MatharuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3687-5119
Lena CiricDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Agnieszka WaleckaIntensive Care Unit, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Yuen-Ki CheongCentre for Engineering Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3737-6285
University of Hertfordshire · GBUniversity College London · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/N034228/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/N034368/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rise of antibiotic resistance, the drive to discover novel antimicrobial substances and standard testing methods with the aim of controlling transmissive diseases are substantially high. In healthcare sectors and industries, although methods for testing antibiotics and other aqueous-based reagents are well established, methods for testing nanomaterials, non-polar and other particle-based suspensions are still debatable. Hence, utilities of ISO standard validations of such substances have been recalled where corrective actions had to be taken. This paper reports a serial analysis obtained from testing the antimicrobial activities of 10 metallic-based nanomaterials against 10 different pathogens using five different in vitro assays, where the technique, limitation and robustness of each method were evaluated. To confirm antimicrobial activities of metallic-based nanomaterial suspensions, it was found that at least two methods must be used, one being the agar well diffusion method, which was found to be the most reliable method. The agar well diffusion method provided not only information on antimicrobial efficacy through the size of the inhibitory zones, but it also identified antimicrobial ions and synergistic effects released by the test materials. To ascertain the effective inhibitory concentration of nanoparticles, the resazurin broth dilution method is recommended, as MIC can be determined visually without utilising any equipment. This method also overcomes the limit of detection (LoD) and absorbance interference issues, which are often found in the overexpression of cell debris and nanoparticles or quantum dots with optical profiles. In this study, bimetallic AgCu was found to be the most effective antimicrobial nanoparticle tested against across the bacterial (MIC 7 µg/mL) and fungal (MIC 62.5 µg/mL) species.

Indexed as

antimicrobial nanoparticlescopperlive–dead assayminimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)resazurinsilver

Identifiers

PMID38002383
PMCPMC10669044
OpenAlexW4388020322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.