Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38002371›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Glutaraldehyde-Free Crosslinking Method for the Treatment of Collagen-Based Biomaterials for Clinical Application.

Marvin Steitz, Sabra Zouhair, Mahamuda Badhon Khan, Alexander Breitenstein-Attach, Katharina Fritsch, Sugat Ratna Tuladhar, Dag Wulsten, Willem-Frederik Wolkers, Xiaolin Sun, Yimeng Hao and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Marvin SteitzDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Berlin (Charité), D-13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3337-9083
Sabra ZouhairDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, Charité University Medicine Berlin, D-13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2123-3674
Mahamuda Badhon KhanDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, Charité University Medicine Berlin, D-13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5642-2219
Alexander Breitenstein-AttachDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Berlin (Charité), D-13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7006-2897
Katharina FritschDepartment Dynamics and Transport in Quantum Materials, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, D-14109 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6202-9859
Sugat Ratna TuladharLower Saxony Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Implant Research and Development, University of Veterinary Medicine Hanover, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5108-3323
Dag WulstenJulius Wolff Institute-Center for Musculoskeletal Biomechanics and Regeneration, D-13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3329-6111
Willem-Frederik WolkersLower Saxony Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Implant Research and Development, University of Veterinary Medicine Hanover, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7406-4651
Xiaolin SunDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Berlin (Charité), D-13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9005-443X
Yimeng HaoDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, Charité University Medicine Berlin, D-13353 Berlin, Germany.
Jasper EmeisDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, Charité University Medicine Berlin, D-13353 Berlin, Germany.
Hans-E LangeDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, Charité University Medicine Berlin, D-13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4926-769X
Felix BergerDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Berlin (Charité), D-13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7881-1557
Boris SchmittDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Berlin (Charité), D-13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6987-1264

Funding

EXIST - Forschungstransfer 03EFIBE103Federal Ministry of Education and Research 13GW0498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological bioprostheses such as grafts, patches, and heart valves are often derived from biological tissue like the pericardium. These bioprostheses can be of xenogenic, allogeneic, or autologous origin. Irrespective of their origin, all types are pre-treated via crosslinking to render the tissue non-antigenic and mechanically strong or to minimize degradation. The most widely used crosslinking agent is glutaraldehyde. However, glutaraldehyde-treated tissue is prone to calcification, inflammatory degradation, and mechanical injury, and it is incapable of matrix regeneration, leading to structural degeneration over time. In this work, we are investigating an alternative crosslinking method for an intraoperative application. The treated tissue's crosslinking degree was evaluated by differential scanning calorimetry. To confirm the findings, a collagenase assay was conducted. Uniaxial tensile testing was used to assess the tissue's mechanical properties. To support the findings, the treated tissue was visualized using two-photon microscopy. Additionally, fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was performed to study the overall protein secondary structure. Finally, a crosslinking procedure was identified for intraoperative processing. The samples showed a significant increase in thermal and enzymatic stability after treatment compared to the control, with a difference of up to 22.2 °C and 100%, respectively. Also, the tissue showed similar biomechanics to glutaraldehyde-treated tissue, showing greater extensibility, a higher failure strain, and a lower ultimate tensile strength than the control. The significant difference in the structure band ratio after treatment is proof of the introduction of additional crosslinks compared to the untreated control with regard to differences in the amide-I region. The microscopic images support these findings, showing an alteration of the fiber orientation after treatment. For collagen-based biomaterials, such as pericardial tissue, the novel phenolic crosslinking agent proved to be an equivalent alternative to glutaraldehyde regarding tissue characteristics. Although long-term studies must be performed to investigate superiority in terms of longevity and calcification, our novel crosslinking agent can be applied in concentrations of 1.5% or 2.0% for the treatment of biomaterials.

Indexed as

biomaterialsbiomedical devicescollagencrosslinkingglutaraldehyde-freeimplantologypericardiumregenerative medicinetissue application

Identifiers

PMID38002371
PMCPMC10669889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.