ReviewBiomedicines2023
Why Intracranial Compliance Is Not Utilized as a Common Practical Tool in Clinical Practice.
Review in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intracranial Pressure Estimation Using B4C Device: A Systematic Review on the Validation Studies.Neurocritical care · 2026Review
- Waveform-Derived Metrics of Intracranial Compliance: Validation and Pulsatile Dynamics.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Cerebrospinal fluid mechanics across CNS barriers: from production, circulation, and clearance to mechanomedicine.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Clinical Performance of the Brain4care System for Noninvasive Detection of Intracranial Hypertension.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- Cerebrospinal fluid pressure dynamics as a biomechanical marker for quantification of spinal cord compression: Conceptual framework and systematic review of clinical trials.Brain & spine · 2025Review
- Characterization of intracranial compliance in healthy subjects using a noninvasive method - results from a multicenter prospective observational study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Observational
- Serum Beta-Secretase 1 Activity Is a Potential Marker for the Differential Diagnosis between Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia: A Pilot Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Feasibility of assessing non-invasive intracranial compliance using FSI simulation-based and MR elastography-based brain stiffness.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Preoperative estimation of intracranial compliance in symptomatic children with Chiari malformation type 1: impact on outcome and risk of complications.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Optimization of number and range of shunt valve performance levels in infant hydrocephalus: a machine learning analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Article
- Can magnetic resonance elastography serve as a diagnostic tool for gradual-onset brain disorders?Neurosurgical review · 2023Article
- Editorial: Modeling and simulation of cerebrospinal fluid disorders.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intracranial compliance (ICC) holds significant potential in neuromonitoring, serving as a diagnostic tool and contributing to the evaluation of treatment outcomes. Despite its comprehensive concept, which allows consideration of changes in both volume and intracranial pressure (ICP), ICC monitoring has not yet established itself as a standard component of medical care, unlike ICP monitoring. This review highlighted that the first challenge is the assessment of ICC values, because of the invasive nature of direct
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.