Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38002015›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Diagnosis of Endometriosis Based on Comorbidities: A Machine Learning Approach.

Ulan Tore, Aibek Abilgazym, Angel Asunsolo-Del-Barco, Milan Terzic, Yerden Yemenkhan, Amin Zollanvari, Antonio Sarria-Santamera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ulan ToreSchool of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Aibek AbilgazymSchool of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Angel Asunsolo-Del-BarcoDepartment of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá, 288871 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7898-4685
Milan TerzicDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-3914-5154
Yerden YemenkhanDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Amin ZollanvariSchool of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Antonio Sarria-SantameraDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-5734-7468
Nazarbayev University · KZCity University of New York · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Nazarbayev University 021220FD115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of estrogen-dependent endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. Despite extensive research, endometriosis is still an enigmatic disease and is challenging to diagnose and treat. A common clinical finding is the association of endometriosis with multiple diseases. We use a total of 627,566 clinically collected data from cases of endometriosis (0.82%) and controls (99.18%) to construct and evaluate predictive models. We develop a machine learning platform to construct diagnostic tools for endometriosis. The platform consists of logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, AdaBoost, and XGBoost for prediction, and uses Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values to quantify the importance of features. In the model selection phase, the constructed XGBoost model performs better than other algorithms while achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.725 on the test set during the evaluation phase, resulting in a specificity of 62.9% and a sensitivity of 68.6%. The model leads to a quite low positive predictive value of 1.5%, but a quite satisfactory negative predictive value of 99.58%. Moreover, the feature importance analysis points to age, infertility, uterine fibroids, anxiety, and allergic rhinitis as the top five most important features for predicting endometriosis. Although these results show the feasibility of using machine learning to improve the diagnosis of endometriosis, more research is required to improve the performance of predictive models for the diagnosis of endometriosis. This state of affairs is in part attributed to the complex nature of the condition and, at the same time, the administrative nature of our features. Should more informative features be used, we could possibly achieve a higher AUC for predicting endometriosis. As a result, we merely perceive the constructed predictive model as a tool to provide

Indexed as

AdaBoostcomorbiditiesdecision treeendometriosisfeature importancelogistic regressionmachine learningrandom forestXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID38002015
PMCPMC10669733
OpenAlexW4388572510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.