ArticleBiomedicines2023
Predictive Modeling and Integrated Risk Assessment of Postoperative Mortality and Pneumonia in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients through Clustering and Machine Learning: Retrospective Study.
Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Factors Associated with Pneumonia in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Pooled it
- Bridging the Artificial Intelligence Translation Gap in Perioperative Pulmonary and Respiratory Complications: A Practical Framework for Institution-Level Implementation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The impact of traumatic injury on the respiratory system; a narrative review of injury-associated and clinically-induced mechanisms of trauma-associated pneumonia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for predicting hypostatic pneumonia risk in large vessel occlusion stroke after endovascular therapy patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study harnessed machine learning to forecast postoperative mortality (POM) and postoperative pneumonia (PPN) among surgical traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Our analysis centered on the following key variables: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), midline brain shift (MSB), and time from injury to emergency room arrival (TIE). Additionally, we introduced innovative clustered variables to enhance predictive accuracy and risk assessment. Exploring data from 617 patients spanning 2012 to 2022, we observed that 22.9% encountered postoperative mortality, while 30.0% faced postoperative pneumonia (PPN). Sensitivity for POM and PPN prediction, before incorporating clustering, was in the ranges of 0.43-0.82 (POM) and 0.54-0.76 (PPN). Following clustering, sensitivity values were 0.47-0.76 (POM) and 0.61-0.77 (PPN). Accuracy was in the ranges of 0.67-0.76 (POM) and 0.70-0.81 (PPN) prior to clustering and 0.42-0.73 (POM) and 0.55-0.73 (PPN) after clustering. Clusters characterized by low GCS, small MSB, and short TIE exhibited a 3.2-fold higher POM risk compared to clusters with high GCS, small MSB, and short TIE. In summary, leveraging clustered variables offers a novel avenue for predicting POM and PPN in TBI patients. Assessing the amalgamated impact of GCS, MSB, and TIE characteristics provides valuable insights for clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.