Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38001752›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases.

Hao Ding, Michal Kawka, Tamara M H Gall, Chris Wadsworth, Nagy Habib, David Nicol, David Cunningham, Long R Jiao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hao DingDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London SW7 2BU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9812-2385
Michal KawkaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London SW7 2BU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5826-8355
Tamara M H GallDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London SW7 2BU, UK.
Chris WadsworthDepartment of Gastroenterology and Surgery, The Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
Nagy HabibDepartment of Gastroenterology and Surgery, The Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4920-4154
David NicolDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK.
David CunninghamDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK.
Long R JiaoDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London SW7 2BU, UK.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBHammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technical limitations of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), in comparison to robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), may translate to high conversion rates and morbidity. LDP and RDP procedures performed between December 2008 and January 2023 in our tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centres were analysed and compared with regard to short-term outcomes. A total of 62 consecutive LDP cases and 61 RDP cases were performed. There was more conversion to open surgeries in the laparoscopic group compared with the robotic group (21.0% vs. 1.6%,

Indexed as

distal pancreatectomylaparoscopicminimally invasive surgerypancreatic cancerrobotic

Identifiers

PMID38001752
PMCPMC10669937
OpenAlexW4388823923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.