ReviewCancers2023
Optical Imaging in Human Lymph Node Specimens for Detecting Breast Cancer Metastases: A Review.
Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal Surgical Margin After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Is a 1 mm Margin Sufficient? A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Article
- Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Nursing-Led Strategies - A Narrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Raman and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for intraoperative cancer diagnostics: sentinel lymph node biopsy, biomarkers and translational challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Real Index of Refraction of Normal and Cancerous Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer Patients: Results from an Experimental Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Application of the OSNA Technique (One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification Test) in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessment of regional lymph node status in breast cancer is of important staging and prognostic value. Even though formal histological examination is the currently accepted standard of care, optical imaging techniques have shown promising results in disease diagnosis. In the present article, we review six spectroscopic techniques and focus on their use as alternative tools for breast cancer lymph node assessment. Elastic scattering spectroscopy (ESS) seems to offer a simple, cost-effective, and reproducible method for intraoperative diagnosis of breast cancer lymph node metastasis. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides high-resolution tissue scanning, along with a short data acquisition time. However, it is relatively costly and experimentally complex. Raman spectroscopy proves to be a highly accurate method for the identification of malignant axillary lymph nodes, and it has been further validated in the setting of head and neck cancers. Still, it remains time-consuming. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging (NIRF) and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DFS) are related to significant advantages, such as deep tissue penetration and efficiency. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) is a promising method but has significant drawbacks. Nonetheless, only anecdotal reports exist on their clinical use for cancerous lymph node detection. Our results indicate that optical imaging methods can create informative and rapid tools to effectively guide surgical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.