Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38001689›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

C-Reactive Protein as an Early Predictor of Efficacy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Tumor Dynamics-Biomarker Modeling Framework.

Yomna M Nassar, Francis Williams Ojara, Alejandro Pérez-Pitarch, Kimberly Geiger, Wilhelm Huisinga, Niklas Hartung, Robin Michelet, Stefan Holdenrieder, Markus Joerger, Charlotte Kloft

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Yomna M NassarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, 12169 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0507-7130
Francis Williams OjaraDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, 12169 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6425-6828
Alejandro Pérez-PitarchTranslational Medicine & Clinical Pharmacology, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Kimberly GeigerInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich of the Free State of Bavaria, Technical University Munich, 80636 Munich, Germany.
Wilhelm HuisingaInstitute of Mathematics, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5249-3914
Niklas HartungInstitute of Mathematics, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4000-6525
Robin MicheletDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, 12169 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5485-607X
Stefan HoldenriederInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich of the Free State of Bavaria, Technical University Munich, 80636 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9210-7064
Markus JoergerDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6602-6287
Charlotte KloftDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, 12169 Berlin, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum München · DEUniversity of Potsdam · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEGulu University · UGUniversity of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In oncology, longitudinal biomarkers reflecting the patient's status and disease evolution can offer reliable predictions of the patient's response to treatment and prognosis. By leveraging clinical data in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy, we aimed to develop a framework combining anticancer drug exposure, tumor dynamics (RECIST criteria), and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations, using nonlinear mixed-effects models, to evaluate and quantify by means of parametric time-to-event models the significance of early longitudinal predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumor dynamics was characterized by a tumor size (TS) model accounting for anticancer drug exposure and development of drug resistance. CRP concentrations over time were characterized by a turnover model. An x-fold change in TS from baseline linearly affected CRP production. CRP concentration at treatment cycle 3 (day 42) and the difference between CRP concentration at treatment cycles 3 and 2 were the strongest predictors of PFS and OS. Measuring longitudinal CRP allows for the monitoring of inflammatory levels and, along with its reduction across treatment cycles, presents a promising prognostic marker. This framework could be applied to other treatment modalities such as immunotherapies or targeted therapies allowing the timely identification of patients at risk of early progression and/or short survival to spare them unnecessary toxicities and provide alternative treatment decisions.

Indexed as

biomarkersC-reactive proteinnonlinear mixed-effects modelingnon-small-cell lung canceroverall survivalprognosisprogression-free survivaltime-to-event analysis

Identifiers

PMID38001689
PMCPMC10670607
OpenAlexW4388694837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.