Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38001501›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Exploring the use of masks for protection against the effects of wildfire smoke among people with preexisting respiratory conditions.

Holly Seale, M Trent, G B Marks, S Shah, A A Chughtai, C R MacIntyre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Wildfire and Smoke Risk Communication: A Systematic Literature Review from a Health Equity Focus.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Wildfire and asthma - The prospective interventions.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Holly SealeSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Level 2, Samuels Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. h.seale@unsw.edu.au.
M TrentThe Biosecurity Program, The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
G B MarksSchool of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
S ShahResearch and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
A A ChughtaiSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Level 2, Samuels Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
C R MacIntyreThe Biosecurity Program, The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUNew South Wales Institute of Psychiatry · AUSydney Local Health District · AU

Funding

MRFF National Health & Medical Research Council/EPCDR - Bushfire Impact Research Grant (MRFF) APP1201320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of wildfire smoke is a growing public health issue, especially for those living with preexisting respiratory conditions. Understanding perceptions and behaviors relevant to the use of individual protective strategies, and how these affect the adoption of these strategies, is critical for the development of future communication and support interventions. This study focused on the use of masks by people living in the Australian community with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

methodsSemi-structured phone interviews were undertaken with people living in the community aged 18 years and over. Participants lived in a bushfire-prone area and reported having been diagnosed with asthma or COPD.

resultsTwenty interviews were undertaken between July and September 2021. We found that, during wildfire episodes, there was an overwhelming reliance on closing windows and staying inside as a means of mitigating exposure to smoke. There was limited use of masks for this purpose. Even among those who had worn a mask, there was little consideration given to the type of mask or respirator used. Reliance on sensory experiences with smoke was a common prompt to adopting an avoidance behavior. Participants lacked confidence in the information available from air-quality apps and websites, however they were receptive to the idea of using masks in the future.

conclusionsWhilst COVID-19 has changed the nature of community mask use over the last couple of years, there is no guarantee that this event will influence an individual's mask behavior during other events like bushfires. Instead, we must create social support processes for early and appropriate mask use, including the use of air quality monitoring.

Indexed as

AsthmaCOVID-19Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveWildfiresAdolescentAdultAustraliaHumansAir pollutionCommunicationMasksPublic healthRespiratory healthWildfire

Identifiers

PMID38001501
PMCPMC10668508
OpenAlexW4388972134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.