Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38001387›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2023

Biomimetic Inspired Hydrogels for Regenerative Vertebral Body Stenting.

Kulwinder Kaur, Ruby Sannoufi, Joseph S Butler, Ciara M Murphy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kulwinder KaurTissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy & Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland.
Ruby SannoufiTissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy & Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland.
Joseph S ButlerNational Spinal Injuries Unit, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Ciara M MurphyTissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy & Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland. ciaramurphy@rcsi.ie.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 101031577Irish Research Council GOIPD/2019/793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review aims to explore the potential of biomimetic hydrogels as an alternative to bone cement in vertebral body stenting (VBS), a minimally invasive treatment for vertebral compression fractures. RECENT

findingsThe use of bone cement in VBS procedures can lead to complications such as incomplete fracture reduction and cement leakage. Biomimetic hydrogels have gained significant attention as potential biomaterial alternatives for VBS due to their unique properties, including tuneable therapeutic and mechanical properties. Over the past decade, there has been significant advancements in the development of biomimetic hydrogels for bone regeneration, employing a wide range of approaches to enhance the structural and functional properties of hydrogels. Biomimetic hydrogels hold significant promise as safer and reparative alternatives to bone cement for VBS procedures. However, further research and development in this field are necessary to explore the full potential of hydrogel-based systems for vertebral bone repair.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesBiomimeticsBone CementsHumansHydrogelsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVertebral BodyBone CementsHydrogelsBiomimetic hydrogelsOsteoporosisVertebral body stentingVertebral compression fractures

Identifiers

PMID38001387
OpenAlexW4389001481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.