ReviewEndocrine2024
Improved guidance is needed to optimise diagnostics and treatment of patients with thyroid cancer in Europe.
Review in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomics and Multi-Omics to Guide Clinical Management in Thyroid Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical actionability of molecular testing in advanced thyroid cancer: a real-world cohort study.European thyroid journal · 2026Article
- Global trend and geographic distribution of thyroid cancer from 1990 to 2021 and its prediction until 2030.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Molecular Diagnostics and Personalized Therapeutics in Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Clinically Oriented Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Molecular predictive biomarker testing in advanced thyroid cancer - a European consensus.European thyroid journal · 2025Review
- Identification of oxidative stress-related subgroups and signature genes for the prediction of prognosis and immune microenvironment in thyroid cancer.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2025Article
- Navigating the complexity of current interventional radiological approaches for distant metastases in thyroid cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Consensus Statement: Recommendations on Actionable Biomarker Testing for Thyroid Cancer Management.Endocrine pathology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although thyroid cancer (TC) is generally associated with a favourable prognosis, there are certain high-risk groups with a clear unmet therapeutic need. Unravelling the genomic landscape of TC has recently led to the development of novel effective targeted treatments. To date, these treatments have mostly been evaluated in non-randomised single-arm phase II clinical trials and are consequently non-reimbursed in several countries. Furthermore, most of these agents must be tailored to individual patient molecular characteristics, a context known as personalised cancer medicine, necessitating a requirement for predictive molecular biomarker testing. Existing guidelines, both in Europe and internationally, entail mostly therapeutic rather than molecular testing recommendations. This may reflect ambiguity among experts due to lack of evidence and also practical barriers in availability of the preferred molecular somatic screening and/or targeted treatments. This article reviews existing European recommendations regarding advanced/metastatic TC management with a special focus on molecular testing, and compares findings with real-world practice based on a recent survey involving TC experts from 18 European countries. Significant disparities are highlighted between theory and practice related to variable access to infrastructure, therapies and expertise, together with the insufficient availability of multidisciplinary tumour boards. In particular, practitioners' choice of what, how and when to test is shown to be influenced by the expertise of the available laboratory, the financing source and the existence of potential facilitators, such as clinical trial access. Overall, the need of a collaborative initiative among European stakeholders to develop standardised, accessible molecular genotyping approaches in TC is underscored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.