Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38001262›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2023

Diversity of current ultrasound practice within and outside radiology departments with a vision for 20 years into the future: a position paper of the ESR ultrasound subcommittee.

Paul S Sidhu, Caroline Ewertsen, Maciej Piskunowicz, Mustafa Secil, Paolo Ricci, Thomas Fischer, Diana Gaitini, Vladimir Mitkov, Adrian K P Lim, Qiang Lu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Systematic review of musculoskeletal ultrasound learning methodologies.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessing Point-of-care Ultrasound Knowledge and Utilization among Emergency Physicians in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-sectional Survey.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Handheld ultrasound for portal vein evaluation in pediatric patients.Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 12 institutions in 10 countries.

Paul S SidhuDepartment of Imaging Sciences, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE17EH, UK. paulsidhu@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1928-4077
Caroline EwertsenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen OE, Denmark.
Maciej PiskunowiczRadiology Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Mustafa SecilDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Paolo RicciUnit of Emergency Radiology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Thomas FischerDepartment of Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Diana GaitiniDepartment of Radiology, Unit of Ultrasound, Rambam Medical Center and School of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Vladimir MitkovDiagnostic Ultrasound Department, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia.
Adrian K P LimDepartment of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust & Department of digestive diseases, reproduction and metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Qiang LuDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Wuhou District, Chengdu, China.
Wui K ChongThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Abdominal Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Houston, Texas, USA.
Dirk Andre ClevertDepartment of Radiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKDokuz Eylül University · TRGdańsk Medical University · PLHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBKing's College London · GBLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DERussian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education · RUSapienza University of Rome · ITSichuan University · CNTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound practice is a longstanding tradition for radiology departments, being part of the family of imaging techniques. Ultrasound is widely practiced by non-radiologists but becoming less popular within radiology. The position of ultrasound in radiology is reviewed, and a possible long-term solution to manage radiologist expectations is proposed. An international group of experts in the practice of ultrasound was invited to describe the current organisation of ultrasound within the radiology departments in their own countries and comment on the interaction with non-radiologists and training arrangements. Issues related to regulation, non-medical practitioners, and training principles are detailed. A consensus view was sought from the experts regarding the position of ultrasound within radiology, with the vision of the best scenario for the continuing dominance of radiologists practising ultrasound. Comments were collated from nine different countries. Variable levels of training, practice, and interaction with non-radiologist were reported, with some countries relying on non-physician input to manage the service. All experts recognised there was a diminished desire to practice ultrasound by radiologists. Models varied from practising solely ultrasound and no other imaging techniques to radiology departments being central to the practice of ultrasound by radiologists and non-radiologist, housed within radiology. The consensus view was that the model favoured in select hospitals in Germany would be the most likely setup for ultrasound radiologist to develop and maintain practice. The vision for 20 years hence is for a central ultrasound section within radiology, headed by a trained expert radiologist, with non-radiologist using the facilities.Critical relevance statement The future of ultrasound within the radiology department should encompass all ultrasound users, with radiologists expert in ultrasound, managing the ultrasound section within the radiology department. The current radiology trainees must learn of the importance of ultrasound as a component of the 'holistic' imaging of the patient.Key points: 1. Ultrasound imaging within radiology departments precedes the introduction of CT and MR imaging and was first used over 50 years ago.2. Non-radiology practitioners deploy ultrasound examinations to either 'problem solve' or perform a comprehensive ultrasound examination; radiologists provide comprehensive examinations or use ultrasound to direct interventional procedures.3. Radiology does not 'own' ultrasound, but radiologists are best placed to offer a comprehensive patient-focused imaging assessment.4. A vision of the future of ultrasound within the radiology department is encompassing all ultrasound users under radiologists who are experts in ultrasound, positioned within the radiology department.5. The current radiology trainee must be aware of the importance of ultrasound as a component of the 'holistic' imaging of the patient.

Indexed as

InternationalPerspectiveRadiologyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID38001262
PMCPMC10673807
OpenAlexW4388978056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.