ReviewCell death and differentiation2024
Exploring the genetic and molecular basis of differences in multiple myeloma of individuals of African and European descent.
Review in Cell death and differentiation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The TP53 gene contains a diversity box that makes it more than a tumor suppressor.Cell death and differentiation · 2026Review
- Associative memory plays a role in ER-1α positive breast cancers.Cell death and differentiation · 2026Review
- Long non-coding RNAs and therapeutic resistance in multiple myeloma: from molecular insights to clinical applications.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Prognostic Value of PSMB5 and Correlations with LC3II and Reactive Oxygen Species Levels in the Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells of Bortezomib-Resistant Multiple Myeloma Patients.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Historical Perspective of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma.Acta haematologica · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple Myeloma is a typical example of a neoplasm that shows significant differences in incidence, age of onset, type, and frequency of genetic alterations between patients of African and European ancestry. This perspective explores the hypothesis that both genetic polymorphisms and spontaneous somatic mutations in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene are determinants of these differences. In the US, the rates of occurrence of MM are at least twice as high in African Americans (AA) as in Caucasian Americans (CA). Strikingly, somatic TP53 mutations occur in large excess (at least 4-6-fold) in CA versus AA. On the other hand, TP53 contains polymorphisms specifying amino-acid differences that are under natural selection by the latitude of a population and have evolved during the migrations of humans over several hundred thousand years. The p53 protein plays important roles in DNA strand break repair and, therefore, in the surveillance of aberrant DNA recombination, leading to the B-cell translocations that are causal in the pathogenesis of MM. We posit that polymorphisms in one region of the TP53 gene (introns 2 and 3, and the proline-rich domain) specify a concentration of the p53 protein with a higher capacity to repress translocations in CA than AA patients. This, in turn, results in a higher risk of acquiring inactivating, somatic mutations in a different region of the TP53 gene (DNA binding domain) in CA than in AA patients. Such a mechanism, by which the polymorphic status of a gene influencing its own "spontaneous" mutation frequency, may provide a genetic basis to address ethnicity-related differences in the incidence and phenotypes of many different forms of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.