Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38001240›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2023

Predicting MYCN amplification in paediatric neuroblastoma: development and validation of a 18F-FDG PET/CT-based radiomics signature.

Luo-Dan Qian, Shu-Xin Zhang, Si-Qi Li, Li-Juan Feng, Zi-Ang Zhou, Jun Liu, Ming-Yu Zhang, Ji-Gang Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Radiomics-Based Machine Learning for DeterminingTechnology in cancer research & treatment
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Development of anQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luo-Dan Qian *Nuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Shu-Xin Zhang *Nuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Si-Qi LiNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Li-Juan FengNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Zi-Ang ZhouNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Jun LiuNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Ming-Yu ZhangNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China. zhangmingyu_118@163.com.
Ji-Gang YangNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China. yangjigang@ccmu.edu.cn.
Beijing Friendship Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China-Shenzhen Robotics Research Center Project 81971642National Natural Science Foundation of China-Shenzhen Robotics Research Center Project 82001861National Natural Science Foundation of China-Shenzhen Robotics Research Center Project 82102088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate an 18F-FDG PET/CT-based clinical-radiological-radiomics nomogram and evaluate its value in the diagnosis of MYCN amplification (MNA) in paediatric neuroblastoma (NB) patients.

methodsA total of 104 patients with NB were retrospectively included. We constructed a nomogram to predict MNA based on radiomics signatures, clinical and radiological features. The multivariable logistic regression and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used for feature selection. Radiomics models are constructed using decision trees (DT), logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. A clinical-radiological (C-R) model was developed using clinical and radiological features. A clinical-radiological-radiomics (C-R-R) model was developed using the C-R model of the best radiomics model. The prediction performance was verified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) in the training and validation cohorts.

resultsThe present study showed that four radiomics signatures were significantly correlated with MNA. The SVM classifier was the best model of radiomics signature. The C-R-R model has the best discriminant ability to predict MNA, with AUCs of 0.860 (95% CI, 0.757-0.963) and 0.824 (95% CI, 0.657-0.992) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curve indicated that the C-R-R model has the goodness of fit and DCA confirms its clinical utility.

conclusionOur research provides a non-invasive C-R-R model, which combines the radiomics signatures and clinical and radiological features based on 18F-FDGPET/CT images, shows excellent diagnostic performance in predicting MNA, and can provide useful biological information with stratified therapy. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Radiomic signatures of 18F-FDG-based PET/CT can predict MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma. KEY POINTS: • Radiomic signatures of 18F-FDG-based PET/CT can predict MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma. • SF, LDH, necrosis and TLG are the independent risk factors of MYCN amplification. • Clinical-radiological-radiomics model improved the predictive performance of MYCN amplification.

Indexed as

18F-FDG PET/CTMYCNNeuroblastomaRadiogenomics

Identifiers

PMID38001240
PMCPMC10673749
OpenAlexW4388967092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.