Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38001157›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2024

Experiences and preferences for learning about neonatal research: insights from parent interviews.

Elliott Mark Weiss, Kathryn M Porter, Ellie Oslin, Mihai Puia-Dumitrescu, Pamela K Donohue, Stephanie L Merhar, Emily Stephens, Amanda Mercer, Benjamin S Wilfond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Determinants of Infant Participation and Non-Participation in Primary Prevention Trials.Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme · 2026
    Article
  5. A quality improvement project to optimize the neonatology research experience for families.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elliott Mark WeissTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. emweiss@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2473-9638
Kathryn M PorterTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1930-9625
Ellie OslinTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-4851-0165
Mihai Puia-DumitrescuDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7847-5204
Pamela K DonohueDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Stephanie L MerharPerinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3331-4220
Emily StephensMcGovern Medical Center at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3732-6170
Amanda MercerCounselor Education Department, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA.
Benjamin S WilfondTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Improving Diversity in Neonatal Clinical Trial EnrollmentK23HD103872 · NICHD · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WEISS, ELLIOTT M · 2021 to 2025
$804k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD103872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParents struggle with being asked to participate in neonatal research. Past work has largely failed to include views of minoritized parents, low-socioeconomic status parents, and those who declined research. We aimed to describe parents' preferences related to learning about eligibility for neonatal research.

methodsQualitative interviews of parents who were asked to enroll their infant in neonatal research. Themes related to parental experiences and preferences for learning about neonatal research were identified using content analysis.

resultsMany parents desired greater involvement of their clinical team. Emotions at the time of recruitment were critically important to parents' experience, where were deeply impacted by interpersonal relationships with research staff. DISCUSSION: Increased involvement of the clinical team and greater sensitivity to the stressors around parent and infant conditions at the time of recruitment for neonatal research should be considered by those attempting to improve recruitment for neonatal research.

Indexed as

EmotionsParentsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID38001157
PMCPMC10939889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.