Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38000873›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2023

Predicting seizure recurrence after an initial seizure-like episode from routine clinical notes using large language models: a retrospective cohort study.

Brett K Beaulieu-Jones, Mauricio F Villamar, Phil Scordis, Ana Paula Bartmann, Waqar Ali, Benjamin D Wissel, Emily Alsentzer, Johann de Jong, Arijit Patra, Isaac Kohane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brett K Beaulieu-JonesDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: beaulieujones@uchicago.edu.
Mauricio F VillamarDepartment of Neurology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Phil ScordisUCB, Brussels, Belgium.
Ana Paula BartmannUCB, Brussels, Belgium.
Waqar AliUCB, Brussels, Belgium.
Benjamin D WisselDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Emily AlsentzerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Johann de JongUCB Biosciences, Monheim, Germany.
Arijit PatraUCB, Brussels, Belgium.
Isaac KohaneDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Characterizing Population Differences between Clinical Trial and Real World PopulationsR00NS114850 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BEAULIEU-JONES, BRETT K · 2023 to 2025
$740k
Characterizing Population Differences between Clinical Trial and Real World PopulationsK99NS114850 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BEAULIEU-JONES, BRETT K · 2021 to 2022
$186k
NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS114850NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS114850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evaluation and management of first-time seizure-like events in children can be difficult because these episodes are not always directly observed and might be epileptic seizures or other conditions (seizure mimics). We aimed to evaluate whether machine learning models using real-world data could predict seizure recurrence after an initial seizure-like event.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study compared models trained and evaluated on two separate datasets between Jan 1, 2010, and Jan 1, 2020: electronic medical records (EMRs) at Boston Children's Hospital and de-identified, patient-level, administrative claims data from the IBM MarketScan research database. The study population comprised patients with an initial diagnosis of either epilepsy or convulsions before the age of 21 years, based on International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD-CM) codes. We compared machine learning-based predictive modelling using structured data (logistic regression and XGBoost) with emerging techniques in natural language processing by use of large language models.

findingsThe primary cohort comprised 14 021 patients at Boston Children's Hospital matching inclusion criteria with an initial seizure-like event and the comparison cohort comprised 15 062 patients within the IBM MarketScan research database. Seizure recurrence based on a composite expert-derived definition occurred in 57% of patients at Boston Children's Hospital and 63% of patients within IBM MarketScan. Large language models with additional domain-specific and location-specific pre-training on patients excluded from the study (F1-score 0·826 [95% CI 0·817-0·835], AUC 0·897 [95% CI 0·875-0·913]) performed best. All large language models, including the base model without additional pre-training (F1-score 0·739 [95% CI 0·738-0·741], AUROC 0·846 [95% CI 0·826-0·861]) outperformed models trained with structured data. With structured data only, XGBoost outperformed logistic regression and XGBoost models trained with the Boston Children's Hospital EMR (logistic regression: F1-score 0·650 [95% CI 0·643-0·657], AUC 0·694 [95% CI 0·685-0·705], XGBoost: F1-score 0·679 [0·676-0·683], AUC 0·725 [0·717-0·734]) performed similarly to models trained on the IBM MarketScan database (logistic regression: F1-score 0·596 [0·590-0·601], AUC 0·670 [0·664-0·675], XGBoost: F1-score 0·678 [0·668-0·687], AUC 0·710 [0·703-0·714]).

interpretationPhysician's clinical notes about an initial seizure-like event include substantial signals for prediction of seizure recurrence, and additional domain-specific and location-specific pre-training can significantly improve the performance of clinical large language models, even for specialised cohorts.

fundingUCB, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US National Institutes of Health).

Indexed as

EpilepsySeizuresAdultChildElectronic Health RecordsHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38000873
PMCPMC10695164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.