Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38000829›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

School health professionals' understanding of culture: a scoping review protocol.

Emmie Wahlström, Sara Landerdahl Stridsberg, Camilla Larsson, Jonas Stier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emmie WahlströmChiP Research Group, Mälardalen University, Vasteras, Sweden emmie.wahlstrom@mdu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-7828-6999
Sara Landerdahl StridsbergUniversity Library, Mälardalen University, Vasteras, Sweden.
Camilla LarssonUniversity Library, Mälardalen University, Vasteras, Sweden.
Jonas StierSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Vasteras, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCulture is highlighted in previous research as important in encounters where health professionals and children do not share a language or culture. In these encounters, culture is described as mainly related to the child, whereas the health professionals' understanding of their own culture as impacting the encounter tends to be left out. To clarify how culture is understood and conceptualised among professionals, it is of relevance to collate previous research on health professionals' understanding of culture. In the scoping review that this protocol describes, we aim to focus on the context of the school health services, being a context accessible to many children in their everyday life. The aim of the review will be to identify, describe and analyse previous research concerning school health professionals' (ie, school nurses, school social workers, school doctors and school psychologists) understanding of culture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will be guided by the methodology described by Peters ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this study. The findings will be disseminated through peer review publication as well as presentation at conferences and to relevant stakeholders.

Indexed as

Peer ReviewSchool Health ServicesChildHealth PersonnelHumansResearch DesignSchoolsScoping Reviews as TopicSocial WorkAdolescentCommunity child healthHealth EquityPrimary Health CarePUBLIC HEALTHSchools

Identifiers

PMID38000829
PMCPMC10680005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.