Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38000737›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2024

Simple SARS-CoV-2 concentration methods for wastewater surveillance in low resource settings.

Mohammad Dehghan Banadaki, Soroosh Torabi, Alexus Rockward, William D Strike, Ann Noble, James W Keck, Scott M Berry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad Dehghan BanadakiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, United States.
Soroosh TorabiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, United States.
Alexus RockwardDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, United States.
William D StrikeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, United States.
Ann NobleDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, United States.
James W KeckWWAMI School of Medicine, University of Alaska Anchorage, United States.
Scott M BerryDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, United States. Electronic address: scott.berry@uky.edu.

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30ES026529 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI MARK B DIGNAN · 2017 to 2026
$15.4M
Wastewater Assessment for Coronavirus in Kentucky: Implementing Enhanced Surveillance TechnologyU01DA053903 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BERRY, SCOTT M · 2021 to 2022
$3.4M
Bio-Psych Stress Measure Associations and Preterm BirthF31NR010046 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI LATENDRESSE, GWEN A · 2006 to 2007
$69k
NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA053903NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES026529NINR NIH HHS F31 NR010046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) measures pathogens in wastewater to monitor infectious disease prevalence in communities. Due to the high dilution of pathogens in sewage, a concentration method is often required to achieve reliable biomarker signals. However, most of the current concentration methods rely on expensive equipment and labor-intensive processes, which limits the application of WBE in low-resource settings. Here, we compared the performance of four inexpensive and simple concentration methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater samples: Solid Fraction, Porcine Gastric Mucin-conjugated Magnetic Beads, Calcium Flocculation-Citrate Dissolution (CFCD), and Nanotrap® Magnetic Beads (NMBs). The NMBs and CFCD methods yielded the highest concentration performance for SARS-CoV-2 (∼16-fold concentration and ∼ 41 % recovery) and require <45 min processing time. CFCD has a relatively low consumable cost (<$2 per four sample replicates). All methods can be performed with basic laboratory equipment and minimal electricity usage which enables further application of WBE in remote areas and low resource settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19Resource-Limited SettingsAnimalsCalcium CitrateSARS-CoV-2SwineWastewaterWastewater-Based Epidemiological MonitoringCalcium CitrateWastewaterInfectious diseasesLow-resource settingSARS-CoV-2Viral concentrationWastewater-based epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID38000737
PMCPMC10842712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.