Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38000384›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2024

Quantification and modeling of turnover dynamics of de novo transcripts in Drosophila melanogaster.

Anna Grandchamp, Peter Czuppon, Erich Bornberg-Bauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. DetectNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Descent from a common ancestor restricts exploration of protein sequence space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Impact of GC content on de novo gene birth.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Expression of De Novo Open Reading Frames in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna GrandchampInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3018-3138
Peter CzupponInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Erich Bornberg-BauerInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1826-3576

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-StiftungDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BO 2544/20-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the transcribed eukaryotic genomes are composed of non-coding transcripts. Among these transcripts, some are newly transcribed when compared to outgroups and are referred to as de novo transcripts. De novo transcripts have been shown to play a major role in genomic innovations. However, little is known about the rates at which de novo transcripts are gained and lost in individuals of the same species. Here, we address this gap and estimate the de novo transcript turnover rate with an evolutionary model. We use DNA long reads and RNA short reads from seven geographically remote samples of inbred individuals of Drosophila melanogaster to detect de novo transcripts that are gained on a short evolutionary time scale. Overall, each sampled individual contains around 2500 unspliced de novo transcripts, with most of them being sample specific. We estimate that around 0.15 transcripts are gained per year, and that each gained transcript is lost at a rate around 5× 10-5 per year. This high turnover of transcripts suggests frequent exploration of new genomic sequences within species. These rate estimates are essential to comprehend the process and timescale of de novo gene birth.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularRNA, UntranslatedTranscription, GeneticAnimalsBiological EvolutionGenomeGenomicsGeographyHumansRNARNARNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID38000384
PMCPMC10783523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.