ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2024
Unlocking the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning for Multi-Omics Characterization of Blood Cancers: A Systematic Review.Cells · 2025Pooled it
- Whole-slide imaging in hematopathology: Current state, challenges and future opportunities.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-based prognostic models in acute myeloid leukemia: systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- A Network-Driven Framework for Drug Response Precision Prediction of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Study of Expression ofMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: An Avenue of Opportunities? A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Enhancing Blood Cell Diagnosis Using Hybrid Residual and Dual Block Transformer Network.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A potential predictive model based on machine learning and CPD parameters in elderly patients with aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic neoplasms.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Patients: From New Biological Insights to Targeted Therapies.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the reviewThis review aims to elucidate the transformative impact and potential of machine learning (ML) in the diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It further aims to bridge the gap between current advances of ML and their practical application in these diseases. RECENT
findingsRecent advances in ML have revolutionized prognostication, diagnosis, and treatment of MDS and AML. ML algorithms have proven effective in predicting disease progression, optimizing treatment responses, and in the stratification of patient groups. Particularly, the use of ML in genomic and epigenomic data analysis has unveiled novel insights into the molecular heterogeneity of MDS and AML, leading to better-informed therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, deep learning techniques have shown promise in analyzing complex patterns in bone marrow biopsy images, providing a potential pathway towards early and accurate diagnosis. While still in the nascent stages, ML applications in MDS and AML signify a paradigm shift towards precision medicine. The integration of ML with traditional clinical practices could potentially enhance diagnostic accuracy, refine risk stratification, and improve therapeutic approaches. However, challenges related to data privacy, standardization, and algorithm interpretability must be addressed to realize the full potential of ML in this field. Future research should focus on the development of robust, transparent ML models and their ethical implementation in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.