ArticleJournal of medical systems2023
A Lightweight Deep Learning Framework for Automatic MRI Data Sorting and Artifacts Detection.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of AI-driven MRI Motion Artifact Detection and Correction.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Deep learning-assisted screening and diagnosis of scoliosis: segmentation of bare-back images via an attention-enhanced convolutional neural network.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Explainable AI in Diagnostic Radiology for Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review, and What Doctors Think About It.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Federated learning for lesion segmentation in multiple sclerosis: a real-world multi-center feasibility study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Brain MRI sequence and view plane identification using deep learning.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop a lightweight and easily deployable deep learning system for fully automated content-based brain MRI sorting and artifacts detection. 22092 MRI volumes from 4076 patients between 2017 and 2021 were involved in this retrospective study. The dataset mainly contains 4 common contrast (T1-weighted (T1w), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1c), T2-weighted (T2w), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)) in three perspectives (axial, coronal, and sagittal), and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), as well as three typical artifacts (motion, aliasing, and metal artifacts). In the proposed architecture, a pre-trained EfficientNetB0 with the fully connected layers removed was used as the feature extractor and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) module with four hidden layers was used as the classifier. Precision, recall, F1_Score, accuracy, the number of trainable parameters, and float-point of operations (FLOPs) were calculated to evaluate the performance of the proposed model. The proposed model was also compared with four other existing CNN-based models in terms of classification performance and model size. The overall precision, recall, F1_Score, and accuracy of the proposed model were 0.983, 0.926, 0.950, and 0.991, respectively. The performance of the proposed model was outperformed the other four CNN-based models. The number of trainable parameters and FLOPs were the smallest among the investigated models. Our proposed model can accurately sort head MRI scans and identify artifacts with minimum computational resources and can be used as a tool to support big medical imaging data research and facilitate large-scale database management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.