ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Implications of ultrasound-based deep learning model for preoperatively differentiating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidimensional deep learning for grading and prognostic assessment of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Deep learning and machine learning in image-based hepatocellular carcinoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- [Ultrasound technology's new application in the diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Radiomics for Detection and Differentiation of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026Review
- From promise to practice: a scoping review of AI applications in abdominal radiology.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- An Updated Review of Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarcinoma: A Rare and Poorly Understood Neoplasm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancements in artificial intelligence applications for liver ultrasound imaging.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Research on the establishment of a four-classification model for breast mass ultrasound images based on transfer learning.PloS one · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Applications and challenges.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Enhancing ultrasonographic detection of hepatocellular carcinoma with artificial intelligence: current applications, challenges and future directions.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Review
- Mixture of Expert-Based SoftMax-Weighted Box Fusion for Robust Lesion Detection in Ultrasound Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe current study developed an ultrasound-based deep learning model to make preoperative differentiation among hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-ICC).
methodsThe B-mode ultrasound images of 465 patients with primary liver cancer were enrolled in model construction, comprising 264 HCCs, 105 ICCs, and 96 cHCC-ICCs, of which 50 cases were randomly selected to form an independent test cohort, and the rest of study population was assigned to a training and validation cohorts at the ratio of 4:1. Four deep learning models (Resnet18, MobileNet, DenseNet121, and Inception V3) were constructed, and the fivefold cross-validation was adopted to train and validate the performance of these models. The following indexes were calculated to determine the differential diagnosis performance of the models, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F-1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) based on images in the independent test cohort.
resultsBased on the fivefold cross-validation, the Resnet18 outperformed other models in terms of accuracy and robustness, with the overall training and validation accuracy as 99.73% (± 0.07%) and 99.35% (± 0.53%), respectively. Furthers validation based on the independent test cohort suggested that Resnet 18 yielded the best diagnostic performance in identifying HCC, ICC, and cHCC-ICC, with the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV, F1-score, and AUC of 84.59%, 92.65%, 86.00%, 85.82%, 92.99%, 92.37%, 85.07%, and 0.9237 (95% CI 0.8633, 0.9840).
conclusionUltrasound-based deep learning algorithm appeared a promising diagnostic method for identifying cHCC-ICC, HCC, and ICC, which might play a role in clinical decision making and evaluation of prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37999743What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.