ArticleEuropean radiology2024
CT analysis of aortic calcifications to predict abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and Validation of Plasma Protein Biomarkers for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Using Integrated Proteomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Perivascular Adipose Tissue Radiomics Predicts Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture: A Multicenter Study.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Article
- Deep learning radiomics model based on contrast-enhanced MRI for distinguishing between tuberculous spondylitis and pyogenic spondylitis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Morphology and biomechanical index predict the rupture location and rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Insulin resistance assessed by estimated glucose disposal rate and the risk of abdominal aortic calcification: findings from a nationwide cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- New Trends of Personalized Medicine in the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- CT and MRI of abdominal cancers: current trends and perspectives in the era of radiomics and artificial intelligence.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture prediction based on sex and diameter could be improved. The goal was to assess whether aortic calcification distribution could better predict AAA rupture through machine learning and LASSO regression. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective study, 80 patients treated for a ruptured AAA between January 2001 and August 2018 were matched with 80 non-ruptured patients based on maximal AAA diameter, age, and sex. Calcification volume and dispersion, morphologic, and clinical variables were compared between both groups using a univariable analysis with p = 0.05 and multivariable analysis through machine learning and LASSO regression. We used AUC for machine learning and odds ratios for regression to measure performance.
resultsMean age of patients was 74.0 ± 8.4 years and 89% were men. AAA diameters were equivalent in both groups (80.9 ± 17.5 vs 79.0 ± 17.3 mm, p = 0.505). Ruptured aneurysms contained a smaller number of calcification aggregates (18.0 ± 17.9 vs 25.6 ± 18.9, p = 0.010) and were less likely to have a proximal neck (45.0% vs 76.3%, p < 0.001). In the machine learning analysis, 5 variables were associated to AAA rupture: proximal neck, antiplatelet use, calcification number, Euclidian distance between calcifications, and standard deviation of the Euclidian distance. A follow-up LASSO regression was concomitant with the findings of the machine learning analysis regarding calcification dispersion but discordant on calcification number.
conclusionThere might be more to AAA calcifications that what is known in the present literature. We need larger prospective studies to investigate if indeed, calcification dispersion affects rupture risk. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Ruptured aneurysms are possibly more likely to have their calcification volume concentrated in a smaller geographical area. KEY POINTS: • Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture prediction based on sex and diameter could be improved. • For a given calcification volume, AAAs with well-distributed calcification clusters could be less likely to rupture. • A machine learning model including AAA calcifications better predicts rupture compared to a model based solely on maximal diameter and sex alone, although it might be prone to overfitting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37999728What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.