Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37999725›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Impairment of the internal forward model and feedback mechanisms for vocal sensorimotor control in post-stroke aphasia: evidence from directional responses to altered auditory feedback.

Zeinab Khoshhal Mollasaraei, Roozbeh Behroozmand

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Domain generalization for voice-based cognitive impairment detection.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zeinab Khoshhal MollasaraeiNeuroSyntax Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Roozbeh BehroozmandSpeech Neuroscience Lab, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing, Callier Center for Communication Disorders, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 2811 N. Floyd Rd, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA. roozbeh.behroozmand@utdallas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9104-1101
The University of Texas at Dallas · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Neural Bases of Vocal Sensorimotor Impairment in AphasiaR01DC018523 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI BEHROOZMAND, ROOZBEH · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Sensorimotor processing of auditory feedback in aphasiaK01DC015831 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BEHROOZMAND, ROOZBEH · 2017 to 2021
$693k
NIDCD NIH HHS K01 DC015831NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study examined opposing and following vocal responses to altered auditory feedback (AAF) to determine how damage to left-hemisphere brain networks impairs the internal forward model and feedback mechanisms in post-stroke aphasia. Forty-nine subjects with aphasia and sixty age-matched controls performed speech vowel production tasks while their auditory feedback was altered using randomized ± 100 cents upward and downward pitch-shift stimuli. Data analysis revealed that when vocal responses were averaged across all trials (i.e., opposing and following), the overall magnitude of vocal compensation was significantly reduced in the aphasia group compared with controls. In addition, when vocal responses were analyzed separately for opposing and following trials, subjects in the aphasia group showed a significantly lower percentage of opposing and higher percentage of following vocal response trials compared with controls, particularly for the upward pitch-shift stimuli. However, there was no significant difference in the magnitude of opposing and following vocal responses between the two groups. These findings further support previous evidence on the impairment of vocal sensorimotor control in aphasia and provide new insights into the distinctive impact of left-hemisphere stroke on the internal forward model and feedback mechanisms. In this context, we propose that the lower percentage of opposing responses in aphasia may be accounted for by deficits in feedback-dependent mechanisms of audio-vocal integration and motor control. In addition, the higher percentage of following responses may reflect aberrantly increased reliance of the speech system on the internal forward model for generating sensory predictions during vocal error detection and motor control.

Indexed as

AphasiaVoiceFeedbackFeedback, SensoryHumansPitch PerceptionSpeechAphasiaAuditory feedbackInternal forward modelSensorimotor integrationStrokeVocal motor control

Identifiers

PMID37999725
PMCPMC10849397
OpenAlexW4388977328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.