Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37999582›Full record

ArticleToxics2023

Alcohol Consumption Assessed by a Biomarker and Self-Reported Drinking in a Sample of Pregnant Women in the South of Europe: A Comparative Study.

Isabel Corrales-Gutierrez, Diego Gomez-Baya, Fatima Leon-Larios, Rocío Medero-Canela, Emilia Marchei, Ramon Mendoza-Berjano, Óscar García-Algar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabel Corrales-GutierrezFoetal Medicine Unit, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-2668
Diego Gomez-BayaDepartment of Social, Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4651-0439
Fatima Leon-LariosNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9475-0440
Rocío Medero-CanelaMultiprofessional Teaching Unit for Family and Community Care in Huelva, Huelva Costa Condado Campiña Health District, 21001 Huelva, Spain.
Emilia MarcheiInstituto Superiore di Sanitá, 00161 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7158-6032
Ramon Mendoza-BerjanoDepartment of Social, Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain.
Óscar García-AlgarNeonatology Unit, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5708-4362
Universidad de Huelva · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversidad de Sevilla · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

Premio Ideas de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla Premio a mejor idea de investigación clínica
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Alcohol consumption during pregnancy is a major concern, particularly in Europe and North America. Its prevalence has so far been under-researched. In most studies, the determination of this consumption may be underestimated, as it is based on the information obtained from questionnaires rather than from biomarkers, which will provide a much more reliable approach. The main objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of consumption during pregnancy as assessed by a questionnaire and a hair biomarker. (2) Method: A cross-sectional study with a random sample of 425 pregnant women treated in public hospital consultations in Seville (Spain) and in the 20th week of their pregnancy, orally interviewed using an elaborated ad hoc questionnaire that evaluated variables of sociodemographic, obstetric, and alcohol consumption. Furthermore, the ethyl glucuronide metabolite (EtG) was tested on a hair sample in 252 pregnant women who agreed to facilitate it. Once the data obtained through the questionnaire and hair test were analyzed, the level of metabolites and self-reported alcohol consumption were compared. (3) Results: The prevalence of self-reported alcohol consumption (questionnaire) was 20.7%, and the real consumption (metabolite analysis) was 20.2%. In 16.8% of pregnant women who declared not consuming alcohol during their pregnancy, noticeable consumption was detected according to the metabolite test. No relevant level of variability in estimated alcohol consumption was detected in the biomarker with respect to the sociodemographic and obstetric variables studied. (4) Conclusions: The prevalence of alcohol consumption during pregnancy obtained through both questionnaires and metabolite analyses was similar and high. There is no association between consumption and sociodemographic factors in this sample. The determination of consumption through biomarkers allows for a more accurate approximation of the prevalence of consumption than estimated through questionnaires. Larger sample-sized studies are needed to determine consumption patterns and thus guide the adoption of more precise policies fostering abstinence from alcohol consumption since the preconception period.

Indexed as

alcohol consumptionbiomarkerfetal alcohol spectrum disorderspregnancySpain

Identifiers

PMID37999582
PMCPMC10675307
OpenAlexW4388734678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.