Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37999504›Full record

ArticleToxins2023

Conotoxin Prediction: New Features to Increase Prediction Accuracy.

Lyman K Monroe, Duc P Truong, Jacob C Miner, Samantha H Adikari, Zachary J Sasiene, Paul W Fenimore, Boian Alexandrov, Robert F Williams, Hau B Nguyen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. In Silico Conotoxin Studies: Progress and Prospects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lyman K MonroeBioscience Division, MS M888, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Duc P TruongTheoretical Division, MS M888, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9806-3274
Jacob C MinerBioscience Division, MS M888, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-5252
Samantha H AdikariBioscience Division, MS M888, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Zachary J SasieneBioscience Division, MS M888, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6020-3828
Paul W FenimoreTheoretical Division, MS M888, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Boian AlexandrovTheoretical Division, MS M888, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Robert F WilliamsBioscience Division, MS M888, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4310-6249
Hau B NguyenBioscience Division, MS M888, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0174-9622
Los Alamos National Laboratory · US

Funding

Los Alamos National Laboratory Directed Research and Development XX9X
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conotoxins are toxic, disulfide-bond-rich peptides from cone snail venom that target a wide range of receptors and ion channels with multiple pathophysiological effects. Conotoxins have extraordinary potential for medical therapeutics that include cancer, microbial infections, epilepsy, autoimmune diseases, neurological conditions, and cardiovascular disorders. Despite the potential for these compounds in novel therapeutic treatment development, the process of identifying and characterizing the toxicities of conotoxins is difficult, costly, and time-consuming. This challenge requires a series of diverse, complex, and labor-intensive biological, toxicological, and analytical techniques for effective characterization. While recent attempts, using machine learning based solely on primary amino acid sequences to predict biological toxins (e.g., conotoxins and animal venoms), have improved toxin identification, these methods are limited due to peptide conformational flexibility and the high frequency of cysteines present in toxin sequences. This results in an enumerable set of disulfide-bridged foldamers with different conformations of the same primary amino acid sequence that affect function and toxicity levels. Consequently, a given peptide may be toxic when its cysteine residues form a particular disulfide-bond pattern, while alternative bonding patterns (isoforms) or its reduced form (free cysteines with no disulfide bridges) may have little or no toxicological effects. Similarly, the same disulfide-bond pattern may be possible for other peptide sequences and result in different conformations that all exhibit varying toxicities to the same receptor or to different receptors. We present here new features, when combined with primary sequence features to train machine learning algorithms to predict conotoxins, that significantly increase prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

ConotoxinsConus SnailAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCysteineDisulfidesPeptidesConotoxinsCysteineDisulfidesPeptidescollisional cross sectionconotoxinsion mobility–mass spectrometrymachine learningpost-translational modificationsprediction

Identifiers

PMID37999504
PMCPMC10675404
OpenAlexW4388296993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.