ReviewSports (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Recovery Methods in Basketball: A Systematic Review.
Review in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scoring and Possession Small-Sided Games Elicit Distinct 48-Hour Muscle Damage and Neuromuscular Responses in Basketball Athletes.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2026Trial
- Acute Effects of 2S-Hesperidin Supplementation on Performance and External Load in Female Basketball Players.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Acute Effects of Three Recovery Interventions on Post-Practice Vertical Jump Force-Time Metrics in Female Basketball Players.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Physical and Performance Profiles Differentiate Competitive Levels in U-18 Basketball Players.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Inter-limb asymmetries in professional male basketball and volleyball players: bilateral vs. unilateral jump comparison.International biomechanics · 2025Article
- Guidelines for Sport Compressive Garments Design: Finite Element Simulations Approach.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Game vs. Practice Differences in External Load in U16 and U18 Women's Basketball Players.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of 2-Point Jump Shot and Free Throw Kinematics in High- and Low-Level U18 Male Basketball Players.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Article
- Basketball Fatigue Impact on Kinematic Parameters and 3-Point Shooting Accuracy: Insights across Players' Positions and Cardiorespiratory Fitness Associations of High-Level Players.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Differences in anthropometric and vertical jump force-time characteristics between U16 and U18 female basketball players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- The effectiveness and applicability of mindfulness intervention in psychological adaptation after sports injury: a systematic review.Australian journal of psychology · 2024Review
- Relationship between sleep quality and quantity and lower-body neuromuscular performance characteristics in semi-professional male basketball players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Relationship between vertical jump performance and playing time and efficiency in professional male basketball players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although different strategies have been implemented to manage recovery-fatigue status in athletes, there is still a lack of consensus on which recovery protocols have the greatest impact and effectiveness when implemented with basketball players, including both physiological and psychological recovery methods. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review is to: (a) determine which recovery methods attain the greatest benefit in restoring the process of attenuating fatigue and (b) provide sports practitioners with guidelines on how some of the most effective recovery strategies can be used to optimize athletes' recovery and ultimately enhance their performance. Using the PRISMA guidelines, a total of 3931 research reports were obtained through four database searches (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science), from which only 25 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The recovery protocols analyzed in this systematic review were: sleep, nutrition, hydration, ergogenic aids, cold-water immersion, compression garments, massage, acupuncture, tapering, mindfulness, and red-light irradiation. The results revealed that all recovery strategies are capable of attenuating fatigue and enhancing recovery in basketball players to a certain degree. However, an individualized approach should be promoted, where a combination of proactive recovery modalities appears to result in the most rapid rates of recovery and athletes' ability to maintain high-level performance. Recovery should be programmed as an integral component of training regimens. Also, cooperation and communication between coaches, players, and the rest of the team staff members are essential in minimizing the risk of non-functional overreaching or injury and optimizing basketball players' on-court performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.