ArticleMetabolites2023
Benchmark Dataset for Training Machine Learning Models to Predict the Pathway Involvement of Metabolites.
Article in Metabolites, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-Quality Predicted Metabolite-Pathway Annotations Expand Pathway Coverage and Increase Enriched Pathway Detection Across Metabolomics Datasets.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Article
- Predicting the pathway involvement of metabolites annotated in the MetaCyc knowledgebase.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- High-Quality Predicted Pathway Annotations Greatly Improve Pathway Enrichment Analysis of Metabolomics Datasets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Predicting the Pathway Involvement of Compounds Annotated in the Reactome Knowledgebase.Metabolites · 2025Article
- QSPR graph model to explore physicochemical properties of potential antiviral drugs of dengue disease through novel coloring-based topological indices.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Article
- Predicting the Pathway Involvement of All Pathway and Associated Compound Entries Defined in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.Metabolites · 2024Article
- Current approaches and outstanding challenges of functional annotation of metabolites: a comprehensive review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Predicting the Association of Metabolites with Both Pathway Categories and Individual Pathways.Metabolites · 2024Article
- Predicting the Pathway Involvement of Metabolites in Both Pathway Categories and Individual Pathways.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Predicting the Pathway Involvement of Metabolites Based on Combined Metabolite and Pathway Features.Metabolites · 2024Article
- Predicting The Pathway Involvement Of Metabolites Based on Combined Metabolite and Pathway Features.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A cautionary tale about properly vetting datasets used in supervised learning predicting metabolic pathway involvement.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolic pathways are a human-defined grouping of life sustaining biochemical reactions, metabolites being both the reactants and products of these reactions. But many public datasets include identified metabolites whose pathway involvement is unknown, hindering metabolic interpretation. To address these shortcomings, various machine learning models, including those trained on data from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), have been developed to predict the pathway involvement of metabolites based on their chemical descriptions; however, these prior models are based on old metabolite KEGG-based datasets, including one benchmark dataset that is invalid due to the presence of over 1500 duplicate entries. Therefore, we have developed a new benchmark dataset derived from the KEGG following optimal standards of scientific computational reproducibility and including all source code needed to update the benchmark dataset as KEGG changes. We have used this new benchmark dataset with our atom coloring methodology to develop and compare the performance of Random Forest, XGBoost, and multilayer perceptron with autoencoder models generated from our new benchmark dataset. Best overall weighted average performance across 1000 unique folds was an F1 score of 0.8180 and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.7933, which was provided by XGBoost binary classification models for 11 KEGG-defined pathway categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.