ArticleMedicines (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Development of a Predictive Statistical Pharmacological Model for Local Anesthetic Agent Effects with Bayesian Hierarchical Model Parameter Estimation.
Article in Medicines (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimization of multimodal analgesic drug combinations under the concept of precision anesthesia.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Dermal Concentration Versus Systemic Bioavailability of Topical Lidocaine and Tetracaine: An Exploratory Pharmacokinetic Pilot Study in Göttingen Minipigs.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As an alternative to animal use, computer simulations are useful for predicting pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular activities. For this purpose, we constructed a statistical model to simulate the effects of local anesthetic agents. To train the model, animal experiments were performed on 6-week-old male Hartley guinea pigs. Firstly, the guinea pigs' backs were shaved, then local anesthetic agents were subcutaneously injected, with subsequent stimulation of the anesthetized site with a needle six times at regular intervals. The number of reactions (score value) was counted. In this statistical model, the probability of reacting to needle stimulation was calculated using the elapsed time, type of local anesthetic agent, and presence or absence of adrenaline. Score values were assumed to follow a binomial distribution at the calculated probability. Parameters were estimated using the Bayesian hierarchical model and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method. The predicted curves using the estimated parameters fitted well the observed animal values. When score values were predicted using randomly generated parameters, the median of duration was similar between animal experiments and simulations (Procaine: 55 min vs. 50 min, Lidocaine: both 60 min, and Mepivacaine: both 85 min). This approach effectively modeled the effects of local anesthetic agents. It is possible to create the simulator using the parameter values estimated in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.