Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37999153›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Application of Machine Learning Based on Structured Medical Data in Gastroenterology.

Hye-Jin Kim, Eun-Jeong Gong, Chang-Seok Bang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Large Language Models in Gastroenterology: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advancements and challenges in gastrointestinal imaging.World journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hye-Jin KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24253, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Jeong GongDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24253, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3996-3472
Chang-Seok BangDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24253, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4908-5431

Funding

Hallym University This research was supported by Hallym University Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The era of big data has led to the necessity of artificial intelligence models to effectively handle the vast amount of clinical data available. These data have become indispensable resources for machine learning. Among the artificial intelligence models, deep learning has gained prominence and is widely used for analyzing unstructured data. Despite the recent advancement in deep learning, traditional machine learning models still hold significant potential for enhancing healthcare efficiency, especially for structured data. In the field of medicine, machine learning models have been applied to predict diagnoses and prognoses for various diseases. However, the adoption of machine learning models in gastroenterology has been relatively limited compared to traditional statistical models or deep learning approaches. This narrative review provides an overview of the current status of machine learning adoption in gastroenterology and discusses future directions. Additionally, it briefly summarizes recent advances in large language models.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegastroenterologymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37999153
PMCPMC10669027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.