Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37998488›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Effects of Using Sitting Position versus Lithotomy Position during the Second Stage of Labour on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes and the Childbirth Experience of Chinese Women: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Li Fu, Jing Huang, Danxiao Li, Huide Wang, Lili Xing, Tao Wei, Rui Hou, Hong Lu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06670235 (Effectiveness of Using Upright Versus Lithotomy Birthing Position on Maternal and Newborn Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06670235 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Using Upright Versus Lithotomy Birthing Position on Maternal and Newborn Outcomes: A Quasi Experimental Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHawler Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled124ConditionsMaternal Outcomes, Newborn ComplicationArmsUpright Birthing Position, Lithotomy Birthing Position
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Li FuSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6068-0744
Jing HuangDivision of Care for Long Term Conditions, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London SE1 8WA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6827-1232
Danxiao LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Huide WangDepartment of Obstetrics, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Lili XingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Tao WeiDepartment of Obstetrics, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Rui HouSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Hong LuSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7347-8046
Peking University · CNBeijing Hospital · CNKing's College London · GB

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation grant number 7222106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing research concerning the effects of the sitting birth position during the second stage of labour on maternal and neonatal outcomes remains controversial, and there is a lack of studies to explore its effect on the childbirth experience. The objective of this study is to explore whether the sitting birth position would influence maternal and neonatal outcomes, as well as the childbirth experience. The prospective cohort design was conducted in the study from February to June 2023, a total of 222 women (including primiparous women and multiparous women) were enrolled in our study, and they were divided into the sitting position cohort (n = 106) or the lithotomy position cohort (n = 116). The pre-designed questionnaire and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) were used for data collection during hospitalisation. Chi-square, Fisher's exact test,

Indexed as

childbirth experiencelabour stage, secondmaternal and neonatal outcomesprospective studiessitting positionterm birth

Identifiers

PMID37998488
PMCPMC10671611
OpenAlexW4388830300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.