ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Representation Learning Method for Circular Seal Based on Modified MLP-Mixer.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes Stamp-MLP, an enhanced seal impression representation learning technique based on MLP-Mixer. Instead of using the patch linear mapping preprocessing method, this technique uses circular seal remapping, which reserves the seals' underlying pixel-level information. In the proposed Stamp-MLP, the average pooling is replaced by a global pooling of attention to extract the information more comprehensively. There were three classification tasks in our proposed method: categorizing the seal surface, identifying the product type, and distinguishing individual seals. The three tasks shared an identical dataset comprising 81 seals, encompassing 16 distinct seal surfaces, with each surface featuring six diverse product types. The experiment results showed that, in comparison to MLP-Mixer, VGG16, and ResNet50, the proposed Stamp-MLP achieved the highest classification accuracy (89.61%) in seal surface classification tasks with fewer training samples. Meanwhile, Stamp-MLP outperformed the others with accuracy rates of 90.68% and 91.96% in the product type and seal impression classification tasks, respectively. Moreover, Stamp-MLP had the fewest model parameters (2.67 M).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.