Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37998200›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Analyzing the Robustness of Complex Networks with Attack Success Rate.

Fangqun Yang, Yisong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fangqun YangState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0009-0003-2753-2576
Yisong WangState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2126-7006

Funding

Guizhou Science Support Project (2022-259)National Natural Science Foundation of China 61976065; 62376066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyzing the robustness of networks against random failures or malicious attacks is a critical research issue in network science, as it contributes to enhancing the robustness of beneficial networks and effectively dismantling harmful ones. Most studies commonly neglect the impact of the attack success rate (ASR) and assume that attacks on the network will always be successful. However, in real-world scenarios, attacks may not always succeed. This paper proposes a novel robustness measure called Robustness-ASR (RASR), which utilizes mathematical expectations to assess network robustness when considering the ASR of each node. To efficiently compute the RASR for large-scale networks, a parallel algorithm named PRQMC is presented, which leverages randomized quasi-Monte Carlo integration to approximate the RASR with a faster convergence rate. Additionally, a new attack strategy named HBnnsAGP is introduced to better assess the lower bound of network RASR. Finally, the experimental results on six representative real-world complex networks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods compared with the state-of-the-art baselines.

Indexed as

attack success ratecomplex networkquasi-Monte Carlorobustness

Identifiers

PMID37998200
PMCPMC10669974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.