Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37997878›Full record

Observational studyRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2023

Transition and continuity of care after hospital discharge for COVID-19 survivors.

Aline Marques Acosta, Carlise Rigon Dalla Nora, Raquel Malta Fontenele, Gisele Knop Aued, Cristhiane de Souza Silveira, Amanda Xavier Sanseverino

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aline Marques AcostaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Enfermagem, Departamento de Assistência e Orientação Profissional, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4816-6056
Carlise Rigon Dalla NoraUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Enfermagem, Departamento de Assistência e Orientação Profissional, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5501-2146
Raquel Malta FonteneleUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Enfermagem, Departamento de Assistência e Orientação Profissional, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7878-4448
Gisele Knop AuedUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Enfermagem, Departamento de Assistência e Orientação Profissional, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5914-1105
Cristhiane de Souza SilveiraUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Enfermagem, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7924-307X
Amanda Xavier SanseverinoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Enfermagem, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2441-5206
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess care transition quality and compare it with the clinical characteristics and continuity of care after hospital discharge of COVID-19 survivors.

methodThis is a descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study, carried out with 300 patients with COVID-19 who were discharged from a hospital in southern Brazil. The Care Transitions Measure (CTM-15) and question guide about symptoms, difficulties and use of health services after discharge were used. Student's t-test, Pearson and Spearman correlation were used.

resultsThe mean score for care transition quality was 74.2 (±18.2). Factors associated with higher quality were receiving care in intensive care (p = 0.001), using non-invasive mechanical ventilation (p = 0.05), using vasopressors (p = 0.027) and having an appointment at the hospital after discharge (p = 0.014). Positive correlated factors were length of stay (p = 0.017), and negative factors were post-discharge symptoms of fatigue (p = 0.001), weakness (p = 0.008), difficulty doing moderate activities (p = 0.003) and how difficult recovery is (p = 0.003).

conclusionMost participants had a satisfactory perception of care transition. However, aspects such as care plans, referrals and follow-up after hospital discharge require improvements.

Indexed as

COVID-19Patient DischargeAftercareCross-Sectional StudiesHospitalsHumansSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID37997878
PMCPMC10669132
OpenAlexW4388836997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.