ReviewBiotechnology progress
Model validation and selection in metabolic flux analysis and flux balance analysis.
Review in Biotechnology progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- BioEMMA: Automated Generation of Model-Specific Escher-Compatible Maps from KEGG Pathways.Biology · 2026Article
- One-pot bioprocessing: dynamics and opportunities for integrated multiproduct recovery-a review.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Review
- Predictive multispecies constraint-based metabolic modeling: case studies and best practices.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Metabolic biochemical models of NmSystems · 2025Article
- In vivo and in silico models of Drosophila for Parkinson's disease.The FEBS journal · 2025Review
- Metabolic flux analysis in leaf metabolism quantifies the link between photorespiration and one carbon metabolism.Nature plants · 2025Article
- Metabolic models predict fotemustine and the combination of eflornithine/rifamycin and adapalene/cannabidiol for the treatment of gliomas.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
13C-Metabolic Flux Analysis (13C-MFA) and Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) are widely used to investigate the operation of biochemical networks in both biological and biotechnological research. Both methods use metabolic reaction network models of metabolism operating at steady state so that reaction rates (fluxes) and the levels of metabolic intermediates are constrained to be invariant. They provide estimated (MFA) or predicted (FBA) values of the fluxes through the network in vivo, which cannot be measured directly. These fluxes can shed light on basic biology and have been successfully used to inform metabolic engineering strategies. Several approaches have been taken to test the reliability of estimates and predictions from constraint-based methods and to compare alternative model architectures. Despite advances in other areas of the statistical evaluation of metabolic models, such as the quantification of flux estimate uncertainty, validation and model selection methods have been underappreciated and underexplored. We review the history and state-of-the-art in constraint-based metabolic model validation and model selection. Applications and limitations of the χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.