Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37997588›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2023

The more things change the more they stay the same: Factors influencing emergency medicine residency selection in the virtual era.

Simiao Li-Sauerwine, Paul Logan Weygandt, Laura Smylie, Kelly Williamson, William Burns, Edgar Ordonez, Nicholas D Hartman, Arlene S Chung, Andrew R Ketterer, Jaime Jordan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Emergency Medicine Residency Website Wellness Pages: A Content Analysis.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Simiao Li-SauerwineDepartment of Emergency Medicine The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3445-6404
Paul Logan WeygandtJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA.
Laura SmylieDepartment of Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA.
Kelly WilliamsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8905-2338
William BurnsBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.
Edgar OrdonezHenry J.N. Taube Department of Emergency Medicine Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8467-7155
Nicholas D HartmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5188-0584
Arlene S ChungDepartment of Emergency Medicine Maimonides Medical Center Brooklyn New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-3869
Andrew R KettererDepartment of Emergency Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2419-8253
Jaime JordanDepartment of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6573-7041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interviews for emergency medicine (EM) residency positions largely transitioned to a virtual-only format in 2020-2021. The impact of virtual interview factors on applicants' rank of programs is unknown. Objective: We sought to assess the impact of modifiable factors in virtual interviews on applicants' rank of EM residency programs. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional mixed-methods survey of students applying to at least one of seven study authors' EM residency programs in the United States during the 2020-2021 application cycle. The survey was developed using an interactive Delphi process and piloted prior to implementation. The survey was administered from May to June 2021 with up to four email reminders. Quantitative analysis included descriptive statistics. Three authors performed a thematic qualitative analysis of free-text responses. Results: A total of 664 of 2281 (29.1%) students completed the survey, including 335 (50.5%) male, 316 (47.7%) female, and six (0.9%) nonbinary. A total of 143 (21.6%) respondents identified as underrepresented in medicine and 84 (12.7%) identified as LGBTQIA+. Respondents participated in a median of 14 interviews and ranked a median of 14 programs. Most respondents (335, 50.6%) preferred a choice of in-person or virtual, while 183 (27.6%) preferred all in-person, and 144 (21.8%) preferred all virtual. The program website and interview social were the most important factors influencing respondent ranking. Qualitative analysis revealed several positive aspects of virtual interviews including logistical ease and comfort. Negative aspects include technical issues, perceived interview hoarding, and barriers to applicant assessment and performance. Demonstrated effort by the program, effective information delivery, communication of resident culture, and a well-implemented interview day positively influenced respondents' rank of programs. Conclusions: This study identified characteristics of the virtual interview format that impact applicants' rank of programs. These results can inform future recruitment practices.

Identifiers

PMID37997588
PMCPMC10664396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.