Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996861›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Trajectories of primary health care utilization: a 10-year follow-up after the Swedish Patient Choice Reform of primary health care.

Hannes Kohnke, Andrzej Zielinski, Anders Beckman, Henrik Ohlsson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannes KohnkeDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. hannes.kohnke@med.lu.se.
Andrzej ZielinskiBlekinge Centre of Competence, Region Blekinge, Vårdskolevägen 5, Karlskrona, 371 41, Sweden.
Anders BeckmanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University Clinical Research Centre (CRC), Box 50332, Malmö, 202 13, Sweden.
Henrik OhlssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University Clinical Research Centre (CRC), Box 50332, Malmö, 202 13, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn January 2010, the choice reform was instituted in Swedish primary health care establishing free entry for private primary health care providers and enabling patients to choose freely among primary health care centers. The motivation behind the reform was to improve access to primary care and responsiveness to patient expectations. Reform effects on health care utilization have previously been investigated by using subgroup analyses assuming a pattern of homogeneous subgroups of the population. By using a different methodological approach, the aim of this study was to, from an equity perspective, investigate long term trends of primary health care utilization following the choice reform.

methodA closed cohort was created based on register data from Region Skåne, the third most populated region in Sweden, describing individuals' health care utilization between 2007-2017. Using a novel approach, utilization data, measured as primary health care visits, was matched with socioeconomic and geographic determinants, and analyzed using logistic regression models.

resultsA total of 659,298 individuals were included in the cohort. Sex differences in utilization were recorded to decrease in the older age group and to increase in the younger age group. Multivariable logistic regression showed increasing utilization in older men to be associated with higher socioeconomic position, while in women it was associated with lower socioeconomic position. Furthermore, groups of becoming high utilizers were all associated with lower socioeconomic position and with residence in urban areas.

conclusionThe impact of demographic, socioeconomic and geographic determinants on primary health care utilization varies in magnitude and direction between groups of the population. As a result, the increase in utilization as observed in the general population following the choice reform is unevenly distributed between different population groups.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformPatient PreferenceAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareSocioeconomic FactorsSwedenDelivery of health careHealth care utilizationHealth equityHealth policyPatient choicePrimary health carePrivatizationSweden

Identifiers

PMID37996861
PMCPMC10668480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.