Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996836›Full record

ArticleAnnals of general psychiatry2023

Nationwide consensus on the clinical management of treatment-resistant depression in Italy: a Delphi panel.

Giuseppe Maina, Marina Adami, Giuseppe Ascione, Emi Bondi, Domenico De Berardis, Dario Delmonte, Silvia Maffezzoli, Giovanni Martinotti, Alessandra Nivoli, Elena Ottavianelli and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of general psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Improvements in health-related quality of life with esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine extended release.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe MainaDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Marina AdamiDepartment of Medical Affairs - Neuroscience, Janssen-Cilag SpA, Cologno Monzese, Italy.
Giuseppe AscioneDepartment of Medical Affairs - Neuroscience, Janssen-Cilag SpA, Cologno Monzese, Italy.
Emi BondiDepartment of Mental Health and Addictions, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII , Bergamo, Italy.
Domenico De BerardisDepartment of Mental Health, ASL 4, Teramo, Italy.
Dario DelmonteDepartment of Medical Affairs - Neuroscience, Janssen-Cilag SpA, Cologno Monzese, Italy.
Silvia MaffezzoliDepartment of Medical Affairs - Neuroscience, Janssen-Cilag SpA, Cologno Monzese, Italy.
Giovanni MartinottiDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging, Clinical Sciences University G.d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Alessandra NivoliDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Medical School, AOU-Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Elena OttavianelliFULLCRO Srl, Via Ignazio Guidi 3, 00147, Rome, Italy. elena.ottavianelli@fullcro.org.
Delphi Panel Collaboration Group
Andrea FagioliniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Janssen (Italy) · ITIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano · ITIstituto per le Applicazioni del Calcolo Mauro Picone · ITH.B. Fuller (United States) · USOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITOspedale San Luigi Gonzaga · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Sassari · ITUniversity of Siena · ITUniversity of Teramo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment-resistant depression (TRD) is defined by the European Medicines Agency as a lack of clinically meaningful improvement after treatment, with at least two different antidepressants. Individual, familiar, and socio-economic burden of TRD is huge. Given the lack of clear guidelines, the large variability of TRD approaches across different countries and the availability of new medications to meet the need of effective and rapid acting therapeutic strategies, it is important to understand the consensus regarding the clinical characteristics and treatment pathways of patients with TRD in Italian routine clinical practice, particularly in view of the recent availability of esketamine nasal spray.

methodsA Delphi questionnaire with 17 statements (with a 7 points Likert scale for agreement) was administered via a customized web-based platform to Italian psychiatrists with at least 5 years of experience and specific expertise in the field of depression. In the second-round physicians were asked to answer the same statements considering the interquartile range of each question as an index of their colleagues' responses. Stata 16.1 software was used for the analyses.

resultsSixty panellists, representative of the Italian territory, answered the questionnaire at the first round. For 8/17 statements more than 75% of panellists reached agreement and a high consensus as they assigned similar scores; for 4 statements the panellists assigned similar scores but in the middle of the Likert scale showing a moderate agreement with the statement, while for 5 statements there was indecision in the agreement and low consensus with the statement.

conclusionsThis Delphi Panel showed that there is a wide heterogeneity in Italy in the management of TRD patients, and a compelling need of standardised strategies and treatments specifically approved for TRD. A high level of consensus and agreement was obtained about the importance of adding lithium and/or antipsychotics as augmentation therapies and in the meantime about the need for long-term maintenance therapy. A high level of consensus and agreement was equally reached for the identification of esketamine nasal spray as the best option for TRD patients and for the possibility to administrate without difficulties esketamine in a community outpatient setting, highlighting the benefit of an appropriate educational support for patients.

Indexed as

AntidepressantsConsensus statementCustomized treatmentEsketamineMajor depressive disorderTreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID37996836
PMCPMC10668442
OpenAlexW4388942032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.